Australians for Science and Freedom held their third annual conference at University of NSW on the weekend, at which I had the great good fortune to present for 15 minutes on a media panel session.
Speaking on YouTube’s Primo Radical on Oct. 24, Chomsky said that for the unvaccinated people who are segregated from society, how they obtain groceries should be left up to them. “How can we get food to them?” asked Chomsky. “Well, that’s actually their problem.”
Yes. He disgraced himself there. But that doea not make what he wrote in Manufacturing Consent wrong. He was right about that. If you look for perfect heroes you wont find any - just got to take the useful info where you find it
Jane Halton is a snake. She’s the epitome of the well connected upper level lifetime “ public servant”. The Australian version of the deep state. Crooked as hell.
Professor Halton was just doing her duty as chair of CEPI, to promote the CEPI agenda of mRNA jabs. The fault here was with the ABC for presenting her as independent, ajd with the Government for hiring her as an advisor -- but they did this precisely because she spent 12 years as top health bureaucrat in Permanent Canberra.
Which is the exact reason CEPI and Big Pharma try to hire such connected people. Julia Gillard is now at Welcome Trust.
This is an issue of systemic collapse due to perverse incentives rather than of individual morality.
CEPI bureaucrats likely believed their own bs and now it is obvious they actually killed and injured millions they are pretending it was all a great success to cover their behinds. Everyone is dirtied up.
The true crime - the really evil part. Is the cover up once you know something has gone catastrophically wrong.
The way they justify it is that acknowledgement might cause political instability. But how is that worse for we the public than democidal stability?
We need accountability so the system can be fixed, the injured acknowledged properly and healed as best we can. RFK had the right idea with a truth and reconciliation commission like south africa after apartheid - problem is so big and everyone in power is implicated so that might be the only possible way forward.
Whatever their original intent, these people are not so stupid that they can’t see the inherent conflicts of interest right at the start.
I am loathe now to attribute ANY truly moral intentions to any of these obviously compromised individuals.
I understand that you are, as a good journalist should, attempting to remain unbiased, however I am under no such restraint and I will stand by my first comment.
Yes, their original intent at CEPI was to hijack the health system for their own agenda of pushing mRNA as a platform technology worldwide. That's precisely why they hired the top health bureaucrats from everywhere they needed for the influence network to be effective.
It's not moral, it's business. CEPI is the co-ordinating offshoot of Wellcome Trust and Gates Foundation. These two "charities" could more properly be seen as an extension of the foreign policy apparatus of the UK and US respectively and the middleman between states and Big Pharma corporations, and health bureaucrats. CEPI does the things the Home Office / State Department / drug cartel cannot be seen to be doing, such as influencing other governments (eg Australia, China, Japan) or the WHO.
Your question about lockdown measures: "was it needed at all?", itself can entail a limited spectrum of debate in which the invisible gorilla assumption is actually that the "cases" identified by PCR testing were evidence of the existence of a novel spreading pathogen. I don't know about the PCR tests used in Australia, but in the US there were a large number of fly-by-night companies manufacturing and distributing PCR tests which were, by scientific standards for such tests, totally inadequate (with only one amplicon, no proper controls, no nested primers - all required by bench scientists for valid testing). It is quite possible that the "cases" of "COVID" were actually just picking up background noise, since there are no "pre-pandemic" measures to compare them to. One biologist has exposed this fraud, and it's nothing to do with the accepted counter narrative of "over-cycling": https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N?start=18m
Agree! I stopped watching mainstream media 5 years ago when EVERY news anchor was breathlessly reporting the daily tally of 'cases' as diagnosed by PCR. Given that we were also told that one of the symptoms was...."having no symptoms" which was a tacit admission that healthy people could return a positive PCR (formerly known as false positive). It was a pandemic of testing - and that was the Gorilla.
The "over cycling" narrative we all swallowed as presented by our "heroes", on which your statement is based, has unfortunate flaws, most likely put there deliberately to lead us off track and reduce our credibility among scientists who actually use PCRs - have a listen to the real reasons why PCRs were fraud, on this link https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N?start=18m
A brilliant piece. There is nothing more disheartening than the wilful ignorance of our peers to think in the slightest bit critically about what happened. What has happened?
When they say the benefits outweigh the risks, they mean that the benefits to them outweigh the risks to you. It wasn’t about saving lives, it was about protecting the state-funded health system and reopening the economy. The vaccinated were the sacrificial frontline. Now it is about a revenue-earning industry funded from our taxes; harm doesn’t seem to matter so long as it makes money and creates jobs.
Noam Chomsky, what a humanitarian, not.
Speaking on YouTube’s Primo Radical on Oct. 24, Chomsky said that for the unvaccinated people who are segregated from society, how they obtain groceries should be left up to them. “How can we get food to them?” asked Chomsky. “Well, that’s actually their problem.”
Just another sanctimonious pig.
Yes. He disgraced himself there. But that doea not make what he wrote in Manufacturing Consent wrong. He was right about that. If you look for perfect heroes you wont find any - just got to take the useful info where you find it
You can, not me.
Jane Halton is a snake. She’s the epitome of the well connected upper level lifetime “ public servant”. The Australian version of the deep state. Crooked as hell.
Professor Halton was just doing her duty as chair of CEPI, to promote the CEPI agenda of mRNA jabs. The fault here was with the ABC for presenting her as independent, ajd with the Government for hiring her as an advisor -- but they did this precisely because she spent 12 years as top health bureaucrat in Permanent Canberra.
Which is the exact reason CEPI and Big Pharma try to hire such connected people. Julia Gillard is now at Welcome Trust.
This is an issue of systemic collapse due to perverse incentives rather than of individual morality.
CEPI bureaucrats likely believed their own bs and now it is obvious they actually killed and injured millions they are pretending it was all a great success to cover their behinds. Everyone is dirtied up.
The true crime - the really evil part. Is the cover up once you know something has gone catastrophically wrong.
The way they justify it is that acknowledgement might cause political instability. But how is that worse for we the public than democidal stability?
We need accountability so the system can be fixed, the injured acknowledged properly and healed as best we can. RFK had the right idea with a truth and reconciliation commission like south africa after apartheid - problem is so big and everyone in power is implicated so that might be the only possible way forward.
Whatever their original intent, these people are not so stupid that they can’t see the inherent conflicts of interest right at the start.
I am loathe now to attribute ANY truly moral intentions to any of these obviously compromised individuals.
I understand that you are, as a good journalist should, attempting to remain unbiased, however I am under no such restraint and I will stand by my first comment.
Yes, their original intent at CEPI was to hijack the health system for their own agenda of pushing mRNA as a platform technology worldwide. That's precisely why they hired the top health bureaucrats from everywhere they needed for the influence network to be effective.
It's not moral, it's business. CEPI is the co-ordinating offshoot of Wellcome Trust and Gates Foundation. These two "charities" could more properly be seen as an extension of the foreign policy apparatus of the UK and US respectively and the middleman between states and Big Pharma corporations, and health bureaucrats. CEPI does the things the Home Office / State Department / drug cartel cannot be seen to be doing, such as influencing other governments (eg Australia, China, Japan) or the WHO.
It’s definitely not moral, however they do tend to project themselves thus, saving lives and healing the world.
I really don’t believe that this is ALL money related though, I suspect that it’s 50/50 money and pure power.
Your question about lockdown measures: "was it needed at all?", itself can entail a limited spectrum of debate in which the invisible gorilla assumption is actually that the "cases" identified by PCR testing were evidence of the existence of a novel spreading pathogen. I don't know about the PCR tests used in Australia, but in the US there were a large number of fly-by-night companies manufacturing and distributing PCR tests which were, by scientific standards for such tests, totally inadequate (with only one amplicon, no proper controls, no nested primers - all required by bench scientists for valid testing). It is quite possible that the "cases" of "COVID" were actually just picking up background noise, since there are no "pre-pandemic" measures to compare them to. One biologist has exposed this fraud, and it's nothing to do with the accepted counter narrative of "over-cycling": https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N?start=18m
Agree! I stopped watching mainstream media 5 years ago when EVERY news anchor was breathlessly reporting the daily tally of 'cases' as diagnosed by PCR. Given that we were also told that one of the symptoms was...."having no symptoms" which was a tacit admission that healthy people could return a positive PCR (formerly known as false positive). It was a pandemic of testing - and that was the Gorilla.
If you like the above debunk of the PCR's here's the latest summary by the same biologist of the whole debacle: https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/7hGWxx8acCjhjcR1zVxGxg
PCRs in Australia were set to 35, so - detected any little fragment and called it "COVID."
The "over cycling" narrative we all swallowed as presented by our "heroes", on which your statement is based, has unfortunate flaws, most likely put there deliberately to lead us off track and reduce our credibility among scientists who actually use PCRs - have a listen to the real reasons why PCRs were fraud, on this link https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N?start=18m
Just saying - using their OWN science & parameters - it's still wrong.
Not gonna stream a long podcast, sorry.
All kinds of things - like - was there nano on the swabs? There are a zillion things wrong with PCR.
BUT the basics: the sample rate - their own "science" (TM) - is the beginning of the wrongs.
A brilliant piece. There is nothing more disheartening than the wilful ignorance of our peers to think in the slightest bit critically about what happened. What has happened?
WOW! Great article! Sharing with some screenshots! It's like water dripping on stone......truth is reaching more people. Keep keeping on! Thank you.
Thanks Anna Marie, champion
When they say the benefits outweigh the risks, they mean that the benefits to them outweigh the risks to you. It wasn’t about saving lives, it was about protecting the state-funded health system and reopening the economy. The vaccinated were the sacrificial frontline. Now it is about a revenue-earning industry funded from our taxes; harm doesn’t seem to matter so long as it makes money and creates jobs.
Precisely, well said
Thank you Alison. Excellent reporting, excellent letter.
Thanks JC