76 Comments
User's avatar
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 25, 2024
Comment deleted
Alison Bevege's avatar

yes. Words create thought. Sloppy language leads to confusion. That's why it's important to use precise language.

It's important to call the mRNA gene-vaccines specifically "gene-vaccines" and not "vaccines". That's correct - they are a gene-therapy technology repurposed to provoke an immune response. The exact same mRNA platform is classified as "gene technology" by both the EMA (euro regulator) and the US FDA, when it is applied to non-infectious diseases such as cancer.

It's nothing like the "vaccine" of old: a precisely measured dose of antigen. It's a pro-drug that turns your cell into the factory for the antigen, meaning there is no precisely measured dose.

It's therefore imperative to be specifically accurate about that wording, because that's how people were deceived.

Similarly the mis-dis-mal information is just new buzzwords to make it sound complex and technical and therefore hoodwink the public

The definitions they have given them are clear as crystal, I've read them.

"Misinformation" just means "being wrong"

"Disinformation" just means "lying"

and "Malinformation" just means "inconvenient but true"

It's a bogus new lexicon for the purpose of deceiving the public

GBH's avatar

Not only gene but GMO vaccines 💉

Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Stephen Blanks: "...in other words the European model doesn’t concentrate power solely in the government regulators, it is democratic in that the courts have the ultimate say".

Oh, you mean like the courts in Australia, which failed to protect the community from mandatory vaccinations, which failed to acknowledge the obligation of medical practitioners to obtain voluntary informed consent for medical interventions, including vaccination.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes as in the institution he likes because he is a lae man and familiar with how it works. It is just as Mike Bemz said about the US foreign policy blob. When they say "our democracy" they mean the institutions they influence, peopled with their cultural tribe. They do not mean "the will of the citizens.expressed by a vote". They hate citizens and despise the working class as cattle to be managed by them. The want to be international elites unbounded by nation states

Elizabeth Hart's avatar

How do we stop this Alison, this never-ending tide of legislation being put in place to control us?!

Politicians and bureaucrats and others ruling our lives - without our informed consent!

We must pushback against these tyrants, make them accountable for the damage they're inflicting on the community.

'Covid' for instance...the biggest crime of all time.

And elections taking place without this debacle being critically reviewed.

All the major parties are implicated. Elections which have taken place without exposure of the damaging actions undertaken by the members of these parties are not legitimate in my view.

This major scandal for example... Coercion, intimidation and mandates preclude voluntary informed consent for vaccination. There has been no valid consent for COVID-19 vaccination: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/coercion-intimidation-and-mandates

iya's avatar

"How do we stop this Alison, this never-ending tide of legislation being put in place to control us?!"

Great question, wish I knew the answer.

Billy Field's avatar

Its stopped in part by word of mouth & telling everyone you can..everywhere you can ..it is VV powerful.....that is why they want to be able to silence speech they don't like by prosecuting it as "Misinformation etc"..how long before the offer to pay "informants".....a great great way is get a few folks & hold up banners in town square &/or outside MPs offices on main roads etc exposing them ...to COST THEM VOTES ...they won't like voting the "party line" if they are up for losing MP's income & more importantly their FAT Parliamentary Pension! The won't meet up, they won't respond to letters,....the only thing I think that works, is threatening their individual "meal tickets".

Alison Bevege's avatar

it's best to start local, in our area in our council. Our mistake is we try to ask nationally for them to listen - no point doing that. got to start local

Alison Bevege's avatar

start local - your council, your street, your ward. Your local council can send a letter to back up Port Hedland council

iya's avatar

I try to speak to people within my neighborhood that I interact with on a daily basis. But so far, these issues are not registering much at the lowest level. There isn't yet much interest. Things may have to get worse first.

Penny Carrier's avatar

In my area, because of a wind farm proposal, some of the people against it are setting up a ratepayers association (almost ready) so that like minded people can lobby the council together including on the Port Hedland thing

Being Nobody, Going Nowhere's avatar

I am very pessimistic that this can be stopped - it is way too late. We trusted our politicians, government agencies and bureaucrats too much and for too long and the 4th estate, the media, is completely compromised and manages to divide society in all of this.

My personal approach is to prepare for a totalitarian state, enjoy life as long it is still free and then use non-violent nonparticipation in all public matters as a protest. Sabotage the system until it collapses by itself. I witnessed the collapse of former East Germany and talked to some of them after the wall came down. That's exactly what brought the system down there. People stopped to actively participate and engage with the totalitarian part of the society. Big black markets for everything and people simply dragged their feet until the system went bankrupt.

More active protests could be defunding. People stop paying taxes in great numbers as protest but they already took that choice away for most employed people.

A certain attitude of none compliance and people need to stop being polite to enforcers of totalitarian rules under the excuse that these guys simply follow orders or have a job to do. If someone works for a totalitarian organisation we shouldn't feel sorry for them or respect them. We don't need to be aggressive or hostile - just let them know every time, over and over again, that we do not agree, that we simply go along because they force us to do so but that doesn't mean we agree, consent or approve. To the contrary.

But the first step is for millions of people to even wake up to this. Most don't know or don't want to know. It will be a long and painful process.

True individual spirituality that can't be manipulated can be a great source of strengths and joy in these testing times to come.

Genuine loving families and communities will be the backbone of the resistance.

We took things for granted and fell asleep on the wheel.

The vultures circling everywhere now, hungry for more power and greed.

Alison Bevege's avatar

we can. it's actually easy to fix but you just can't complain about it you have to actually join up and get involved. That means leaving the house and going to a meeting in a room of people that disagree with you, and putting your case to them. People don't tend to do that but we must. It's not about convincing others, it's about YOU doing it. Nobody is coming to your rescue

Alison Bevege's avatar

join civil society groups like the NSW CCL and FSU, and Australians for Science and Freedom, AMPS, Coverse, and the Aligned Councils etc- these groups can help us

and support coverse

and talk to your local Ward Councillors too they are for your street and your area - you can get them on board with Port Hedland's council motion. That will be wonderful to have some councils backing them up

Les Kraft's avatar

..Yes , indeed , the City of Charles Sturt , here in Adelaides west , has already confirmed their willingness to , and I quote --- ‘ they can assist you , ( us) , with any , ( repeat ANY ), COVID enquiries you may have . !

Wow, I’m in , boots and all -

And at the appropriate time, I’ll hand deliver ALL, and ANY Covid enquiries , thank you Port Headland - directly to Health Minister Butlers office - , whom is my federal Minister , ( for National Health no less ) ....

There is hood, Elizabeth... the Calvary approaches ... Alison & Elizabeth ... pls keep going , I sense a seismic shift in this hard slog of 4 years ...

Les Kraft's avatar

......x....there is hope

Paul's avatar

A lot like the Human Rights Commission saw nothing wrong with Forced Injections.

Well done to all involved in revealing this facade of an organisation.

Perhaps this can be an impetus for all of the other State Civil Liberty Organisations to come out in support of your motion and/or be against the Misinformation Bill in the hope of restoring credibility to the overall organisation. Hopefully they aren’t as captured by fools like in NSW, however if they are the same as NSW, it’s better to know about their stupidity/treachery sooner rather than later. It’s too serious of an issue and the stakes are extremely high. Imagine giving power over speech and future generations to some unelected bureaucrats and the courts…Insanity!!!

Alison Bevege's avatar

there are a lot of good people at the NSW CCL so hopefully this will give them the impetus they need to change direction. We really need everyone to help save these precious rights

Matilda Bawden's avatar

The NSW Council for Civil Liberties is to free speech what AHPRA is to health care. All our institutions have been captured.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes - we were all asleep and thought they were doing their job. But the price of freedom is we cant leave it to others anymore we all have to join and be involved

Its no good complaining we have to fix it by ourselves. There is no cavalry coming to save us,.we.will only get what we build

Les Kraft's avatar

, correct , Mat ... so what is our strategy to free them from this capture ...

We have witnessed what that meant with AHPRA , in terms of many thousands of dead & injured Aussies ...

Bryan's avatar

With all due respect to you may be being a member of the NSW CCL, they and all their like organisations around Australia ceased to be relevant when they were all completely mute when it came to the stomping on civil liberties during COVID.

IMO the only value this organisation has is so ambitious people can pad their resumes by being members.

Alison Bevege's avatar

There is an element of that with the young students i think as it looks good on the resume for future careers in politics and law. They want to be on the elevator up. But there are people with ideals in there too so they are not a lost cause

Debra Yuille's avatar

I was not politically engaged pre 2020 and when the lockdown (2 weeks to flatten the curve) happened in 2020 I went looking for an organisation that supported Civil Liberties. I got very excited when I came across the QLD Council for Civil Liberties. That excitement soon evaporated when it quickly became clear that they saw me as of no value, I had no fancy letters after my name therefore in their view I had nothing to offer. It was also very quickly, very clear that they were following the Government line and yes the translation of their correspondence to me echoed your conclusion in regards the NSW Council for Civil Liberties “we’re the experts, shut up.”

When I saw that the submissions in regards the Censorship Bill that the QLD Council for Civil Liberties and the NSW Council for Civil Liberties made and noted the similarities between the two it caused me concern, when I saw they were both asked to present to the Enquiry Committee my heart sank.

Both these organisations are inappropriately named. They do not stand for the most basic of Civil Liberties "Free Speech." They should be renamed Council for Government Liberties.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes i get the feeling from the nswccl that they highly value legal degrees and perhaps dont value ordinary folk. However they do a lot of submission work requiring legal expertise so in some sense that is understandable. But at the end of the day what good is expertise if they abandon their core function.

Transcriber B's avatar

Totally agree.

I would add that it's not just "we’re the experts, shut up” but “we’re the government-approved experts, shut up.” I'm thinking of experts such as Dr. Aaron Kheriatry of UC Irvine, Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale University, and so many more who have affiliations and degrees and even whole careers at top universities, and nonetheless, when they questioned or criticized covid policy, they got brutally censored.

David White (Oz Dave)'s avatar

Thank you, Alison. Imperial College London and the WHO have a lot to answer for. Stanford University had been compiling seroprevalence data since mid 2020, and their surveys from there became all the more comprehensive after the rollouts of the injections. 1 January 2023: “The median [pre-vaccination] IFR was 0.0003% at 0–19 years, 0.002% at 20–29 years, 0.011% at 30–39 years, 0.035% at 40–49 years, 0.123% at 50–59 years, and 0.506% at 60–69 years.”

‘Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population’ (1 January 2023). Professor John Ioannidis (Stanford University) et al.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393512201982X?fbclid=IwAR08I3niEbtp3WoG0e1WquaGn_McJn1RxdO3Zygp_JW5l-PZAfqAF8IWV2c

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes indeed correct. I quoted the same study for under 60s median ifr. That is how we were tricked. A combo of Neil Ferguson, WHO exaggeration and failure to communicate the age-dependent risk levels

David White (Oz Dave)'s avatar

Absolutely. As for the injections, the narrative-followers never go into the adverse events data: https://unsupervised.online/tag/covid-19/

David White (Oz Dave)'s avatar

Not to date at least. Thanks again for your work.

Michael Ginsburg's avatar

NOTHING left to salvage which I would argue is actually very liberating.

LONG LIVE THE CONFEDERACY! 💪

https://substack.com/@michaelginsburg/note/c-55999264

User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 25, 2024
Comment removed
Alison Bevege's avatar

well that just means don't do those things that don't work, try something new, like talking to your ward representatives from local Council, and getting your Council involved

also joining these civil society groups like NSW CCL and going to the meetings and being heard there.

you can't just opt out and complain and then go to a protest with people who all think the same as you. It's the people who don't know or don't agree that you need to be talking to.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 26, 2024Edited
Comment removed
Alison Bevege's avatar

that's fair enough

Alison Bevege's avatar

No the nswccl is hugely useful and hard working and helpful in other ways like right to protest

They just took a wrong turn here

User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 25, 2024
Comment removed
Alison Bevege's avatar

organising locally through your council WORKS

Joining these established civil society institutions WORKS

this is what works.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 25, 2024
Comment removed
Alison Bevege's avatar

yes, Queensland has one that is said to have been more pro-free speech (but i read their submission and it didn't look like they were)

but this is the entire point. We must join them and talk to them, and bring them back to their core function

Michael Ginsburg's avatar

What was their track record during the mandates? Did they do anything more than 'paperwork' or not even that?

Alison Bevege's avatar

if you see my previous story (i linked it above on "previous submission" for the 2023 version of the act, in the academic fraud section, then you will see their track record during mandates.

The important thing is that they change course now. No good crying over spilt milk, the important thing is that they must change now.

Michael Ginsburg's avatar

I’ll have a look but respectfully Alison, I very much doubt they will change course.

If they have been taken over by the enemy from within (which is what I suspect has happened), they are very likely gone for good.

Will be delighted to be proven wrong on this but so far I haven’t even once unfortunately.

Alison Bevege's avatar

it's not "the enemy" it's your countrymen who disagree with you

if you complain and sit at home or go to a protest with those who already agree with you then nothing changes

Michael Ginsburg's avatar

I don't think you quite understood who I am referring to when I say the "enemy". This is who I am talking about:

https://actionabletruth.substack.com/p/who-are-they-exactly

Also, there are ABSOLUTELY "my countrymen" amongst the enemy's ranks! There is no doubt about it and I can easily name names if you like. They are traitors and should be handled as such!

They are the enemy not because they "disagree" with me or anyone else. It is because what they actually DID to their own countrymen (and women).

Claire Hansen's avatar

Thank you for sharing this! It’s a pity Christopher Hutchins had to put the boot into religion at the half way mark. It’s simply tragic how his anger at God muddled his thinking. But on freedom of speech he is a great advocate, and now it is our turn. Of the 10 members who support basic civil liberties, it might be time to submit 10 separate individual submissions opposing the bill! And to unite with politicians who push back like Andrew Wilkie, Senator Rennick, Robert’s and the Coalition

Claire Hansen's avatar

Alison, please be sure to check out Matt Taibi’s work on the censorship push at Racket News! Latest scandal is revealing, UK NGO working to take down Twitter, in an alliance of “left wing” globalists like the Democrat party and Australian Labour Party.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes i have seen - the centre for countering digital hate was unmasked as a true villain just a political attack group pretending to be something it wasnt. Matt taibbi my favourite journalist apart from also glenn greenwald, Julian assange amd paul thacker

SteveH's avatar

These people are worse than pathetic....... They should be renamed as Council for No Liberties.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Well now that is not true - they did great work defending the right to protest recently. It is just they have forgotten free speech

Billy Field's avatar

My mate says you give up all your Civil Liberties when you get married! Seriously this article must make any thinking person shudder in fear & disappointment ...The so called protectors of Civil Liberties become Control freaks? Infiltrated, captured or what? Sad.

Billy Field's avatar

A friend says, ..."NSW Council for Civil Liberties just get basic civil rights issues wrong".

Transcriber B's avatar

Appalling news. But in line with so much else that has come with this covidian catastrophe. On the other hand, I am heartened to see this new Australian Free Speech Union. If it's anything like the UK's FSU, it will do a great things for Australians.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes it is part of the UK FSU it is australian branch. But we do need both. We need all hands on deck or we are going to lose our most precious rights

Diane's avatar

Thank you for this post, and for bringing the motion. It would seems the NSW Council for Civil Liberties should be disbanded. Who is to decide what is misinformation? Stephen Banks? Josh Pallas? The people who want this power eare the very people who should not have it. They couldn't tell their arse from their elbow, let alone decide the truth. Safe and effective.

Alison Bevege's avatar

NsW CCL do a lot of good work you dont see. They are very hard working and put submissions on a lot of legislation that is complex and technical. They deserve the infkuence they have and are indispensibke. But they just have to remember what their core mission is and come back to it

Diane's avatar

Hopefully they choose to do that.

Quoth The Raven's avatar

Thanks Alison for posting this and to you and the others for having turned up and tried. Can’t have been easy to have walked amongst the deliberately misinformed and to witness their morally-bankrupt pantomime first hand.

The transcript makes for dismal reading.

Shelves full of books and no soul, it’s almost possible to feel sorry for them in the knowledge that somewhere and in some timeline, karma will be waiting. It’s the universe they have to answer to, not us. Meanwhile, 18 people know what they just did with their vote.