95 Comments
User's avatar
Julian Gillespie's avatar

thank you Alison

Alison Bevege's avatar

Goodness thanks you wonderful hero. You have worked so hard to help us all.

Coldaxx's avatar

She’s spreading absolute nonsense.

Madeleine Love's avatar

I'm a bit confused by a couple of statements.

The mRNA lipid nanoparticles invade cells and harness the cellular machinery to produce spike proteins, which were engineered to move to the cell membrane.

The body sees these infected cells as aberrant, and the major responders have been reported to be the NK (Natural Killer cells), and some other T-cells. The Natural Killer cells typical roam the body destroying any cells that look aberrant - new cancer cells or virus-infected cells - but as they rush in to deal with the vaccine-infected cells, they empty the roving population from the rest of the body. So I suppose cancer being maintained gets a run while not being monitored. And probably why latent viruses have also been getting a run, resulting in shingles, for example.

I've only seen studies reporting that the vaccine spike protein elicits IgG4 (immune tolerance) antibodies, not all sorts of different cancer cells.

Craig Outhwaite's avatar

Try this PubMed article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37243095/ - final paragraph: Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals.

Madeleine Love's avatar

Thanks for the article. The full text had a whole section on identifying IgG4 presence/relative concentration associated with cancer. What isn't clear to me yet is the question of whether IgG4 raised specifically against spike protein antigens could have a general promotional effect of cancer. It talked of, for example, melanoma cells producing high levels of "tumour specific" IgG4 that perhaps told the immune system "yeah, not to worry, nothing to see here" allowing the melanoma to stave off attack. I haven't read it that deeply yet.

That said, many risk-associations have been made between the spike protein and pro-cancer-related mechanisms, so any tolerance of spike protein/covid could increase the duration over which cells could be adversely influenced. Stephanie Seneff has done a lot on that: https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=seneff+spike+proteins+cancer&btnG=

I'd been understanding post-vax myocarditis as the Natural Killer self destruction of heart cells transfected by lipid nanoparticles, with young, body building males with high-capillaried deltoid muscles increasing the risk of injectate travelling to the heart, or perhaps through the lymph system. I don't know if 'autoimmune' only refers to this, or in a different sense. There was a terrible possible outcome, where, on identifying human cells with spike proteins popping out of their surface, as though they are themselves a virus, the human immune system may mistakenly recognise natural features of the cell as part of the new enemy, and develop a novel autoimmune response against healthy cells. There is some evidence of this happening, with rising deaths to myositis - an autoimmune response against one's own muscle cells.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Your last point on autoimmune problems attacking own cells sounds logical and seemed to me exactly why mRNA was a crazy idea to begin with. When i first heard of it using your own cells to make the antigen, I immediately thought that is asking for autoimmune issues.

Madeleine Love's avatar

Insane, right? I also know that genetic inventions are messes and we've got evidence already of an additional frame-shifted protein, with people developing antibodies against it. What if there's homology with other human proteins, and their new antibodies attack them? So much basic testing they never did. It's criminal.

Alison Bevege's avatar

You would need to ask Professor Dalglaish I think. He referred to a process of T-cell exhaustion in addition to the IgG4 problem

Madeleine Love's avatar

Early on I was sure I found studies talking about CD8+ T-cell depletion post-vax, and then they seemed to disappear. I went back and spent some hours - couldn't find them. After a while the only studies I found were on post vax CD8+ depletion in people living with HIV.

On the other hand there's heaps and heaps of studies on CD8+ depletion in severe covid - in the early days it almost became used as a diagnostic marker for severe covid, as opposed to other possible causes for illness. I pursued it for a while - there can be CD8+ depletion in influenza for example, but I recall Igor Chudov promoting a study that said the spike protein can destroy CD8+ T-celsl - I think it came from (batwoman) in China.

https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/sars-cov-2-kills-t-cells-just-like?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web&s=r

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes this is too technical for me to know the answer. You would definitely need to ask Professors Angus Dalgleish or Robert Clancy

Madeleine Love's avatar

Thanks - don't worry about it. That part of my brain just got reignited - I'm only finishing out my thoughts.

Dr Phillip Chalmers's avatar

Just so. At last I hear from a healthy sceptic with in depth technical knowledge.

My first order guess is that a worldwide change in the epidemiology of cancers and other conditions following a pandemic of a novel virus is caused by the virus.

This needs to be tested without hysteria, conspiracy theories or wild idiosyncratic assertions that the whole discipline of infectious disease discovery and elucidation over the last two centuries was actually a political conspiracy. Substack is a toxic environment for rational and disciplined discussion of these topics.

Madeleine Love's avatar

My scepticism is cruelly applied to all theories, which is why I have no friends :)

Thus, I'm called to say that, if you want to argue that the virus itself caused an increase in cancer, you would have to argue against the plethora of very eager research wanting to show that SARS-CoV-2 is an oncolytic virus (kills cancers) as discussed here.

https://madeleinelove.substack.com/p/cordially-invited-to-comment

In Australia we had the vaccines long before we had the virus, and the cause of death data shows a fairly clear turning point in deaths attributed to cancer (although a solid portion may have been unacknowledged vaccine deaths).

I suspect the vaccines are not good, at least in the fact that the initial round (at least, before specific immunity) drew off the Natural Killer cells, perhaps letting some cancers get away.

Dr Phillip Chalmers's avatar

Reality is not binary, I declared a first order proposition, the thing that has been done in the past to commence inquiry in cause/effect issues of human health for centuries. I expect both will prove true and applaud research into both.

HIV is an single strand RNA virus, so is Sars. HIV causes immune exhaustion and cancer in different people. The more we discover about the complexity of the immune system the more we know how little we yet understand it.

Reality testifies to unpredictable complexity and that is why understanding of human health and disease was minuscule until the last 200 years.

As a front-line medical practitioner in Australia I dispute any veracity in the assertion that we had vaccine before we had active transmission of the virus in our nation.

MicroRNA and fragments of single-strand RNA coronavirus may overlap giving us a theoretical field of immense importance to be explored.

Nobel Prize 2024

Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun were interested in how different cell types develop. They discovered microRNA, a new class of tiny RNA molecules that play a crucial role in gene regulation. Their groundbreaking discovery revealed a completely new principle of gene regulation that turned out to be essential for multicellular organisms, including humans. It is now known that the human genome codes for over one thousand microRNAs. Their surprising discovery revealed an entirely new dimension to gene regulation. MicroRNAs are proving to be fundamentally important for how organisms develop and function

Madeleine Love's avatar

We had statistically irrelevant covid prior to the introduction of the vaccines - we counted almost all of the cases, once testing ramped up, and very few deaths, largely confined to aged care facilities. So when one examines deaths to cancer, with a clear turning point beginning with the vaccine rollout, at a time where Australia had been in a prolonged covid zero (except for minor incursions held at the border), we're either looking at cancer deaths promoted by the vaccines (perhaps immune shock, if not rapid cancer growth), or we're looking at misattributed vaccine deaths to an underlying condition.

On working out separate cause and effect of vaccine vs virus, one can get a fairly clear answer from the Cause of Death statistics, because various causes have different patterns - some accelerated with the vaccines in 2021 (eg hypertension and atrial fibrillation), others with the virus in 2022, underpinned by vaccine effects. Th systematic reviews/meta analyses support this. It would be good to have the actual vaccine-matched cause of death data, but Health doesn't seem to want to hand it out, and not-so-strangely they aren't reporting on it.

The HIV-identical (apparent) insertions at the binding tips of the sars-cov-2 viral spike proteins are not a good sign for long term immune health for people who've had covid. Likewise the vaccine-generated spike proteins seem to hit T cell populations.

On the microRNA, specifically MIR168, I learnt in 2012 that we may be what we eat, via "Exogenous plant MIR168a specifically targets mammalian LDLRAP1: evidence of cross-kingdom regulation by microRNA". It now has 1,366 citations and I'm not sure where that original finding has come to, but one must question the impact of the genetic engineering of food, with the same inadequate regulation as that of pharmaceuticals.

https://www.nature.com/articles/cr2011158.pdf

DrDrPH's avatar

But the mRNA technology embedded in a widely bioavailable lipid nanoparticle envelope that carries its genetic payload into billions of cells in all organs - and the mRNA modified by pseudouridine to be long lasting - many months as reported in peer-reviewed research - means spike protein is made in cells in all organs in (depending on batch variability & quality of the vial) prolonged fashion & large amounts - in other words these are not ‘vaccines’ like any previous - they are a synthetic virus technology.

Worse - pseudouridine causes frame shifting when read by the ribosomes- producing nonsense proteins.

Even worse - the mass manufacturing technique for the modified mRNA involved using E Coli plasmid DNA & contamination with this DNA in abnormally dangerous amounts has been found in Pfizer & Moderna vials. With the LNP taking this DNA contamination through nucleus membranes integration into our human DNA is possible leading to production in such cells of abnormal proteins with oncogenic potential.

Worse -SV40 contamination is also found in the vials. This is a known cancer promoting gene sequence.

Sure SARS-CoV-2 and particularly its spike protein causes pathology. But this so called ‘vaccine’ gene technology does the same - & in unlucky people who got worse vials - far more pathogenic than a case of Covid fought off in the upper airways.

Alison Bevege's avatar

that's a wonderful summary

Dr Phillip Chalmers's avatar

We are in agreement. All single strand RNA molecules - native from the environment and developed by humans - must now be treated with extreme circumspection as treatments.

The pre-2020 notion that a new method of rapid vaccine development was become available using single strands of RNA coding for a chosen antigen was brilliant, and plausible and FLAWED.

This is 20/20 hindsight - I cannot give the CCP Military virologists the benefit of the doubt as to sinister motivation - but I can accept that the vaccine manufacturers commenced their endeavours in good faith with noble intentions in response to a crisis pandemic.

As to now resisting restraint, denying the evidence unfolding of widespread unintended consequences I disapprove and recommend against their persistence.

They have been enabled by government, they must be restrained by government.

A personal opinion: AstraZeneca used double-strand DNA for the spike protein, this is vastly more stable than single strand RNA loose in plasma and cellular sap and I hope it is not entirely abandoned but thoroughly researched before any attempt at use outside a laboratory is considered.

What I will not join, nor give even tacit approval to, is the wolf-pack baying for the throats of others in vengeance for the catastrophe which has ensued.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Well Phillip, there's a really easy way to tell. No need to over-complicate matters.

All the Health Department needs to do, is to publish the raw all-cause-mortality figures stratified by age and gene-vaccine status, for every year from 2020 on.

Then we can easily see if it was the virus or the gene-vaccine that is causing all the excess deaths, and since cancer is a big driver of death, we can get an idea from that.

Then if you want to narrow it down to cancer, you could ask them to compile the raw all-cancer-diagnosis figures stratified by age and gene-vaccine status.

easy to do if you're the government with an $8 billion to spend on gene-vaccines alone, and an MRFF full of research funds.

Why don't you ask them? I have asked for the all-cause-mortality figures many times, they don't want to release those figures.

Phillip Alan's avatar

I cannot detect the data which would specifically differentiate between the cancers produced by fragments of the spike protein mRNA from the vaccines and the fragments of the spike protein mRNA from the virus and the fragments of the all the other RNA from both the actual infection and the contaminated vaccines.

Is the specificity I describe still unclear? The devil is in the detail.

Everyone is guessing. The mode of production of malignancy is also being ignored; there is no reason to believe there is a single causal pathway here and it is being forgotten that cancer is not a single disease. Each cancer is its own kind as from different tissues and organs with very different properties.

Mack_5x5's avatar

Thank you for reporting this important information,Alison.I will be sharing with my family and friends.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Thank you so much yes please do it might save them from injecting any more in future especially since they will be releasing more mRNA products soon

Aaron Press's avatar

I hope that all the politicians will be there listening and taking it all in.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes i hope so too, but i fear it will be the exact same 6 or 7 heroes and none of the others

Aaron Press's avatar

Does anyone know what the turnout was like in parliament for this talk. I had to a course for work unfortunately as I would like to have listened

Alison Bevege's avatar

Good question - I would like to know the same thing! I will try to find out but it might take a while. Also tonight the Port Hedland council is voting on joining the call to ban the mRNA

Aaron Press's avatar

Whoa that is good news. I see other places around the world are doing the same

Bronwyn Patterson's avatar

Not likely to listen. Cognitive dissonance affects them too when they realise they are complicit

Wilson Sy's avatar

When these and other real experts speak in parliament, the cowardly politicians all walk out of the chamber and then the next day declare there is no evidence of the vaccines causing harm.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes that is what happens. Willful blindness. Thank you for your hard work I have come across it recently well done you!

Wilson Sy's avatar

Thanks. With coercion and mandates, we are literally fighting for our lives.

Alison Bevege's avatar

I agree with you on that - it's not over because they are building the factories. Once built, they will need markets

Wilson Sy's avatar

It seems you have good connection with the vaccine-injured. Could you collect short statements or at least signatures from thousands of them? This could form the basis for a "Bodily Integrity Bill" proposed by a private-member in parliament. Politicians will be forced to take notice, particularly if their own seats are at risk.

bloke's avatar

just go to jabinjuriesglobal and you will have as many statements/stories as you want and that is just one site. https://jabinjuriesglobal.com/

Alison Bevege's avatar

thank goodness for Jab Injuries Global documenting those stories. How wonderful is that group. Without them, no voice at all

Wilson Sy's avatar

Thanks. Eventually, we want the injured to make submissions to support a human rights bill on bodily autonomy/integrity to protect one's life.

Alison Bevege's avatar

that sounds like a good idea - however would it not be easier just to amend the Discrimination Act to insert the words "vaccine status"? That does everything at once. They did try this and failed a couple of times, One Nation tried and so did someone else, but we could simply try the same thing again until it is made law, for that one simple change would protect everyone?

Wilson Sy's avatar

No. They could force vaccinate everyone , without discrimination. You have explicitly prevent violation of bodily integrity as in the Nuremberg Code.

John Drousas's avatar

Bill Gate$, $oro$, WEF and the satanic UN behind this all.

bloke's avatar

yes I watched that happen in British parliament one day when one fellow tapped the others on the shoulder as he walked past on the way out. Just ridiculous. They will pretty soon be held to account. isn't it interesting that Keytruda is supposedly an immunotherapy drug that shouldn't have too much side effect if indeed it is promoting the immune system. The poor old body in the poisoned ones wont know what to do.

Coldaxx's avatar

He’s not a real expert.

Nina's avatar

Absolutely and I can't get my gp to look into anything sadly 😞 money is more important than the Hippocratic Oath

Alison Bevege's avatar

Yes i bought my GP a ticket but she didnt go. One lives in hope

Geoff Pascoe's avatar

I tried to forward this interesting article to my mother who has a Bigpond account. It seems Telstra have blocked this article and refer to it as spam. I'm absolutely shocked.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Goodness. Does it do that any other time you forward? Or just this time?

Geoff Pascoe's avatar

No just this time. My other 2 brothers that I forwarded it to received my e-mail but not my mum. My brothers have a gmail account.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Thanks for letting me know, i cannot do anything about it sadly. I wonder if they use the AI to scan email contents

bloke's avatar

off course they would. Time to change email addresses, browsers, operating systems etc etc all totally away from big tech. or put it in a document with a link and a password etc. Maybe then it will go through.

Coldaxx's avatar

Probably because it’s spreading harmful misinformation.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Another excellent piece exploring the mRNA shots and turbo cancer is here at Coquin de Chien, including actual photos of turbo cancers that grew out of the Pfizer injection sites on both arms of a 92-year-old woman who died six months later https://therealcdc.substack.com/p/what-put-the-turbo-in-turbo-cancer

LouieM's avatar

Thank you heaps Alison. I am away on-site (FIFO), thus will miss the Perth event.

I really do appreciate you & others keeping us all informed the way you do.

Cheers xoxox

Alison Bevege's avatar

Thank you Louie. Good on you for even knowing about Substack! I fear soon the censorship will throttle even this

Bronwyn Patterson's avatar

I truly hope not. There is great evidence based research being undertaken and findings disseminated

Unjabbed Mick (UK)'s avatar

Hi Philip and Allison!

I'm in conflict with my local GP practice, which I have just learned is part of a larger consortium of Private Health providers. Since 2021, I have frequently sent evidence of Vax harms, excess Deaths, Unsafe and ineffective injections called VACCINES, etc,. They have now decided I must be reigned in from spreading the truth. They suggest that my 'opinions and beliefs' are unwanted and unhelpful in their quest in providing care in their patients best interests.

I've told them that I am NOT sending my 'OPINIONS and BELIEFS' but factual evidence of what has been apparent since the release of a man-modified disease in late 2019 and the dangerous 'cure' (Vax) that was knocked up in a few short weeks.

Your article reflects my beliefs but more importantly, states facts about the damage done by mRNA injections. Mat I use your article to demonstrate the deadly nature of where the medical world has sunken in the past 4 years?

Thanks for your cooperation and guidance in these difficult times!

Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll all live longer without corrupt medical interference!

Alison Bevege's avatar

Hello there, all my substacks are free and in the public domain so you can certainly reuse. But if I may suggest - if they told you they don’t want to listen then it will not help to keep telling them. It will only drive them away. Don’t send them any more, better to try something different like organising a stand in the park for example. Even if it is just you for a while perhaps set up a picnic table on a regular saturday or sunday morning and engage with any who will listen

Building a community takes time and is slow but will get you further than trying to convince that GP practise who are not wanting to hear

Unjabbed Mick (UK)'s avatar

Thanks Alison! I joined a Stand in the Park in the early days of Covid & the jab. I wore different yellow tee-shirts with various Covid, Vax, Ivermectin, etc, messages on. When the Ukraine debacle kicked off a guy came up to me and said "you've got to move on - Covid and Vax are yesterdays issues". I realised the calibre of twats we are dealing with.

I still wear my controversial tee-shirts even in hospital appointments, (and when undergoing 2 recent medical operations), dentist visits and general shopping trips. I feel good getting the messages out there. I'm sure many are pleased to see their suspicions are held by others. One older lady came up to me in a supermarket and said "Thank you" 3 times. She had a tear in her eye but didn't want to chat. I wonder whether she lost someone dear to her following the DEATH SHOT!

If I get a reaction from the medical profession, at least they'll be aware that many of us question what has been going on since Covid was modified for Profit!

Unjabbed Mick (UK).

Unjabbed Mick (UK)'s avatar

Hi Alison! Latest in trying to convince the deaf they should open their minds! I don't capitulate easily!

Latest; This is getting very interesting!

As you know, because 'xxxxxxxx' Premier Healthcare has not responded to my reply email, I've sent my second Vax Warning email to the Doctors and the Private Health consortium who sent me the 'warning'.

I've heard nothing since their initial Cease & Desist threat! So I compiled another 3 items related to the rife corruption and deliberate hiding of the truth behind Covid & the deadly vax. Let's see whether they respond this time?

Bizarrely, the 'warning letter' came from the Private Health organisation to whom I was referred to by the NHS for my two recent operations. The sender of the warning is based at the local PRIVATE hospital where both ops took place. I've got a physio appointment there in a few days, so will ask if the 'sender' is available for a chat!

I'm sure they don't even realise I'm currently under their 'Private Health' treatment as an NHS sponsored patient. The 'sender' is in 'Admin'. Wierd eh? I'll report the events after my next hospital physio visit.

Unjabbed Mick (UK)

Alison Bevege's avatar

yes, Mick, if they have sent you a cease and desist notice then immediately stop. Don't send them anything more.

Making space for people in the community to share what happened to them in a place where they won't be abused as "antivaxxers" and where they will be listened to is far more important than harassing a medical clinic which is what you will be doing by repeatedly contacting them to tell them when they have said not to.

Unjabbed Mick (UK)'s avatar

Sorry Alison, but capitulation is not in my nature. I've told them I'm prepared to send just ONE email per week to a specified email address, as long as I receive a meaningful response suggesting they've read the email. They failed to respond, so I've sent last weeks email with another series of 'FACTS', along with evidence and details of each contributor's qualifications. (Doctors, Professors, etc). So the ball is in their court. I won't STOP because someone pretends their not interested in learning how the public is being harmed. It;s their duty to know the true facts about the many hidden VAX dangers and long term adverse reactions - or a shortened Life Expectancy for many vax recipients.

Therefore I must reject your suggestion that I submit.

Best Regards! Unjabbed Mick (UK).

Alison Bevege's avatar

if you make yourself a nuisance by repeatedly browbeating people who have clearly said to you they don't want you to contact them, then you must stop and do something else because you won't be actually helping only making it worse.

Unjabbed Mick (UK)'s avatar

That's very defeatist and capitulating at the first rebuttal! Sorry, but it's not my style. If I persist something will happen - eventually! People might actually read some of the truth I submit. To 'stop' because someone has refused to engage is giving up at the first hurdle! I'll push my point until they eventually respond. Unjabbed Mick (UK)

Being Nobody, Going Nowhere's avatar

Great article, Alison. Thanks. Not sure if it will turn the tide, but try we must. Just don't forget your loved ones and looking after yourself while you still can. And also enjoy life while you still can. You are against some very powerful dark forces.

Alison Bevege's avatar

Thanks you wonderful person. We must try for what else can we do? We cannot look away

Miechelle Michaelis's avatar

The Hidden Genocide: Chemical Contamination, Corporate Greed, and Premature Deaths

In a world where profit-driven corporations and governments have actively downplayed the consequences of environmental contamination, we find ourselves grappling with widespread mutations, infertility, and the premature deaths of millions. What is happening is not an unfortunate accident, but rather a calculated form of genocide, perpetuated through the intentional contamination of our environment and the dismissal of those suffering from its consequences. From the poisons in our water to the chemicals in our air and food, the evidence is clear—our health is being sacrificed for profit.

The Roots of Contamination: Greed Over Humanity

Since the late 1970s, the plastic, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries have worked hand-in-hand with governments to push narratives that deflect blame from their toxic products and practices. In the name of progress and economic development, these industries have knowingly unleashed poisons into our ecosystems. Plastics, for example, have been lauded for their convenience, while their manufacturers quietly funded propaganda to shift the responsibility for their waste to the public. While we were told to recycle, corporations continued producing billions of tons of non-biodegradable waste, knowing full well that most plastic cannot be recycled.

Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry has been complicit in pushing harmful psychoactive drugs, disguised as treatments for mental health conditions that, in many cases, are exacerbated by the same environmental toxins they help proliferate. Instead of addressing the root causes of these health crises, governments and their corporate backers have engineered a system that treats humans as expendable subjects in a grand experiment of chemical warfare.

Widespread Mutations and Infertility

The contamination of our land and water by chemicals like lead, cadmium, mercury, and PCBs has resulted in a dramatic increase in genetic mutations. Communities exposed to these toxins, such as those near Superfund sites or coal mining areas, have experienced elevated rates of cancers, birth defects, and infertility. The TP53 gene mutation, known to cause various forms of cancer, has been found to be exacerbated by these environmental contaminants. Our genetic material is being altered, not by nature, but by the greed of corporations who profit off the very chemicals poisoning us.

Studies have shown that communities near industrial pollution centers experience higher rates of infertility, as the toxic soup of chemicals in their environment interferes with reproductive health. The lead and arsenic in the water, the microplastics in the food supply, and the pesticides sprayed on crops have all contributed to a silent epidemic of infertility, miscarriages, and stillbirths. This is not by accident but by design—a methodical elimination of vulnerable populations under the guise of industry advancement.

Premature Deaths: The Ultimate Price of Contamination

Across the world, people are dying prematurely due to exposure to environmental toxins. The cancer epidemic that has swept across industrialized nations cannot be ignored, nor can the sudden increase in autoimmune diseases, neurological disorders, and developmental disabilities. These are the direct results of the poisons that have been allowed to seep into every facet of life. Communities near coal mines in Kansas, for instance, have been struggling with the long-term effects of heavy metal contamination from mining operations, resulting in polluted water and sickened populations .

Fluorinated chemicals, also known as PFAS, are another silent killer. Despite decades of scientific evidence proving their toxicity, they continue to be used in countless everyday products, contaminating water supplies and accumulating in human bodies. The result? Cancers, organ damage, and deaths that are never attributed to the corporations responsible for dumping these toxins into the environment .

The Propaganda Machine

The government’s role in this genocide cannot be understated. Through regulatory agencies designed to protect public health, the government has instead shielded corporations from accountability. The EPA, for instance, has been slow to regulate dangerous chemicals, often acting only after public outcry, and even then, the regulations are too weak to make a real impact. These same government agencies, together with corporate-funded scientists, have deliberately obscured the truth about the dangers of these chemicals, while the public is fed propaganda that suggests the victims themselves are to blame.

Conclusion: No More Victim Blaming

The victims of this ongoing genocide—people who are sickened, who die young, who cannot have children—are not at fault. It is the system, the government, the corporations, and the scientists who have profited from their suffering that must be held accountable. We cannot allow the narrative to continue that lifestyle choices are to blame for diseases caused by environmental poisoning. As long as corporate profits are prioritized over human life, we will continue to see widespread death, infertility, and genetic mutation.

The time for truth and accountability is now.

Miechelle Michaelis's avatar

This is ridiculous mutated and contaminated will never get better like this

Ralph Lewis's avatar

mRNA set the stage for a WORSE COVID-VaXX “gain-of-function” stage in CURRENT ‘explosive health events’ ( Turbo Cancer$ worldwide ). It was also preplanned and may be amplified by shedding from the ‘new’ REPLICON vaXXcines being promoted in Japan now. ( if “released” to their public )

( see Billionaire Gate$’ old, hopeful smirk$ )

However, Ivermectin in HIGH DOSES looks like a solution by another highly credible, CLINICAL Canadian, Dr. Wm. Makis, MD

https://open.substack.com/pub/makismd/p/ics6-japan-presentation-in-tokyo?r=1lx7va&utm_medium=ios

Lee Rammelt's avatar

Ooffff I am not sure if I understood all you shared here. It’s a lot of information to digest. I will reread it. I have been in remission for a rare sarcoma (PEComa) for years now and have not been vaccinated. I was worried it would mess up my immune system again. I have had COVID twice and recovered slowly, but fully.

DrDrPH's avatar

You made a wise choice.

Alison Bevege's avatar

oh thank you that's terrific, I appreciate it. If I may make a request? The subheading right under the head is in the same format as the intro which sort of buggers up the start - is there any way you can bold it? Also is there any chance you might link "letters from australia" to the page here as in a link credit? I really appreciate you republishing it by the way, it makes me happy and makes it all worthwhile.