What was fascinating to me was how COVID changed my own behaviour. I didn't HAVE to restrict myself to a 15 minute zone around my house - but I did. The more they COVID'd, the closer I stayed to home. My map of comfort has shrunk; I already live in a 15 minute city, even though it's not enforced. Just a matter of throwing some switches to make it firm.
On 16 April 2025, backdating to 10 April 2025, Centrelink suspended my Age Pension payments I had since June 2007, which I view is another form of TERRORISM to try to break me for daring to expose their misuse/abuse of powers. My blog at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati sets out matters. In months before my (now late) wife passed away we were terrorized by Banyule City Council repeatedly climbing over fences, vandalizing her legally parked motor vehicle, damaging private property, causing physical harm to my wife, etc. the more they do the more I am determine and pursue to hold them legally accountable! it is only when people stand up for their rights that the evil doers discover they no longer have their assumed power!
HANSARD 22-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON: Let this speech do for the referendum also.
Mr. TRENWITH: I say with these evidences of the desire on the part of the people for more freedom, for greater facilities for giving effect to the popular will, we ought to make provision in this Constitution by which the will of the people can become law. If we do that we shall be doing something which will make it more certain that this Constitution will be adopted by the people.
END QUOTE
.
Hansard 1-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention),
QUOTE Mr. OCONNER (New South Wales).-
Because, as has been said before, it is [start page 357] necessary not only that the administration of justice should be pure and above suspicion, but that it should be beyond the possibility of suspicion;
END QUOTE
HANSARD 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.-Our civil rights are not in the hands of any Government, but the rights of the Crown in prosecuting criminals are.
END QUOTE
The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
for the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE
.
HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
END QUOTE
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
END QUOTE
And
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
END QUOTE
And
Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it must in its very essence be a free Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary that is secured in the very way in which the freedom of the British Constitution is secured. It is secured by vesting in the people, through their representatives, the power of the purse, and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of securing absolute freedom to a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than that which we contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect the citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily government of the country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom is the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution. There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every one has sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people. We have provided for a Judiciary, which will determine questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions which should be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
END QUOTE
When we have a unlawful court system and an Attorney-Generals who seem to me to be incompetent as a First Law Officer then this may underline how sick our legal system truly is.
My view is, that the contracts with the pharmaceutical companies were unconstitutional and this means that pharmaceutical companies can be held legally accountable for the harm inflicted upon Australians. As for politicians: Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
The Commonwealth still exist but the politicians are pretending otherwise. As long as we do not accept their nonsense and TREASON we will continue to have the Commonwealth as provided by the Framers of the Constitution. As I proved in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka on 19 July 2006 (representing myself) that the Commonwealth DPP and the 9 Attorney-Generals couldn't defeat me! And this underlines that as long as you stand your ground they more than likely find not to have the power they held they had!
good point about public servants. Colonisation was a bit more complex however, some of it was brutal notably in Tasmania, but other areas it was simply settlement and a meeting of two cultures. The last of the Pintupi walked out of the Western Desert in 1984 and were angry their relatives hadn't told them about the supermarket for example. They'd never seen glass before. I have read some of the earliest newspapers when Sydney as a colony was only 15 years old and it's quite interesting to read the earliest interactions. They mostly centred around food. Aboriginal people liked the new foods, the melons, the sheep. The British tried to get them into farming and homestead living. There was cultural exchange that was not at all brutal or exploitative going on there, too.
And here's the thing - remember the 60's, when the UK decided that Australia was their very own personal nuclear test site?
I don't see these mRNA plants proliferating in the US - and certainly not at the per-capita level that it is happening here! I think they got a case of NIMBY.
Interestingly, regarding IV bags. A friend who worked for Tuta Laboratories in Australia says we were making plastic blood bags in the 1980s before the company was taken over by a foreign firm then sold overseas because there was no government support to keep the industry in Australia. The misallocation of mountains of tax dollars to the mRNA ecosystem going on now is all subject to public-private partnerships. The model is to team up a university with a Big Pharma company and the government funding. But who gets to profit when the public pays? The company? The contracts are suspiciously secret. There's no transparency. So what if an Australian university helps invent a product if the company takes the patent rights. And again - a mountain of money is being redirected to a technology that is not as useful or safe as advertised, at the expense of the basic needs of the citizens.
And we know who will be getting the profits - not us!
Like the mining industry, our governments feed these companies with funding (either directly or via tax breaks) and let them keep the profits for themselves (perhaps one or two or several of our politicians will have substantial share-holdings). We the people are supposed to be grateful for the jobs they are creating...
That's on top of all the concerns about the mRNA technology, which is an outrage in itself.
No surprise. In the US, everything was made here. Since companies moved out since 1990's, we manufacture very little at all here. It's not by accident, & it's really difficult to compete with slave labor elsewhere. So many old name companies are no longer producing dependable appliances for instance. American made hot water heaters lasted decades, but nearly all made in Red China now, average life is 10 years as opposed to my personal experience of an American made water heater lasting 42 yrs, replaced in end of 2012, & already replaced with a new one again in 2023. Same experience with an electric stove, already have replaced twice. It's ridiculous!
Anytime I see a shortage in Australia, at first I thought "supply chain" and "tyranny of distance."
But when it became essential medicines, a little light went off in my brain: What if it is because they want to reformulate essential medicines to ensure that we all get the nanotech?
Saline is one of the products which Dr. David Nixon has grown some little nano-beasties from.
Most if not all products now contain nefarious substances. Go back to the basics whenever possible; grow your own food and/or network with like minded people to find locally grown/raised items (Fred of pesticides and j a bs. Even the municipal water is unsafe. Add Geoengineering into the mix and it’s a toxic soup to say the least. Humans must unite against our extermination or our species will perish.
This is brilliant, thank you Alison... Yet again I'll be forwarding this article... Great work... These factories are sinister, not only in their funding, but the fact they are manufacturing something that's been proven to cause death and injury... It's very concept has death and injury written all over it...
These factories scare the crap out of me, like they're wanting an endless inescapable supply of this rubbish.
Even if you were super pro vax, I mean "super super pro vax", surely the fact that an Adelaide professor had what sounds like an extremely viable non mRNA vaccine for covid, you'd have to question why did our government not throw money into that?
That would have meant local jobs, money for the government, and ongoing development of a local product. Yet not only was this guy silenced and censored, he was actively fined $300,000 by the TGA for uttering his vaccine's name!? Think about that... All we heard on the news was Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca etc. BEFORE the products were on the market, with representatives of that company talking up their products... Yet the local guy was fined $300,000 and ignored, perhaps even gaslighted by our own government.
Seeing all this unfolding I feel like I'm in some alternative reality at the moment, something akin to invasion of the body snatchers where everyone is in the cult and there's only a few of us left for them to conquer. I can't believe so many are going along with it all. Especially scientists.
I heard recently on a cafe locked out podcast that a Victorian gp who was raided by police and patient files taken and suspended by AHPRA that AHPRA was not acting under a law, but under a memorandum of understanding with the health department. That would make all of their oppressive actions illegal?
Sadly I was coerced, had one Pfizer and am vax free injured- pericarditis permanent heard damage and other issues. I went to one of Dan Andrews hubs - guess what no batch number on my vax card
I’m ok my neurones are still synapsing most of the time. Last 3 years have been tough, accepting loss but f quality is f life, and realising I’m probably living on borrowed time time. Emotionally it’s been hard to stay positive and motivation waxes and wanes. Overall I can’t really complain I’m not dead and soon to be 72 I’ve had a life- good bad and ugly unlike the relatively younger people who are living with crippling outcomes and will never have a normal life.
Shame on these Basditios who did this to you Julie and the many others who believed the corporate grubberment lies. May they rot in hell.
Don't give in, stand strong, take the known natural preventives and believe in yourself. I note your replies/viewing points in many substacks and I appreciate your input.
You are more worthy than these Parasitic Basditios who deem us their slaves. They have no clue what awaits them.
sorry to hear that Julie, I am so sorry. I wish I could make it better in some way but I can't. You could join Dr Melissa McCann's class action perhaps? Court date is due in December
yep they don't like us one bit. I went to Lizard Island where you can camp on the barrier reef... and i saw their culture in microcosm. What they want is for the billionaires in their private resort waited on hand and foot. They want only so many young and good looking servants to cook and clean and drive them around, and take them out in the boat. Then the Museum research station is on the island also. They love it because they get proximity to the billionaires in the private resort. They run tours for them. The billionaires love the scientists because they get to feel super privileged and smart.
then because it's public land, they can't own it, the barrier reef is a national park, there's a token campsite for boaties and the public. less than 15m from the water (crocodile threat) with no running water. You're told in no uncertain terms not to go anywhere near the private resort they don't want to see or hear YOU the public.
and that's the template. that's the 15-minute cities. We will be herded into a pen so the the billionaires don't have to look at us or feel like we're chewing up "their" resources or living on "their" wide open land.
and the science elite gets to go along and feel like they're billionaires too
Check out Kate Mason substack she has a lot of information about land transfer and plans of local, state and fed gov. Plus I think the move to give Indigenous people land back is only temporary, they will steel it back once it is out of private and state ownership. I heard that hikers in the blue mountains have found 80% of trails have been closed with signs warning you not to enter. It is really happening and fast, scary stuff. It is time to act now, move to vote for the right people in local councils for starters.
thank you steve, super kind. Yes i know what you mean by feeling like we lurched into some alternate reality. These factories are a bad sign particularly the melbourne one. You don't have to look far to see the hand of Barda, the militarised arm of US Health and Human Services behind the push for all this, and CEPI of course (which is to say Bill Gates and WEF and WHO)
Not as yet, Finn, no. I’ve mainly been looking at o/s productions, such as Vera Sharav’s 5 part series Never Again is Now Global and others, as well as interviews and papers.
For awake people who are still working, I don’t blame them for not going any further. What I find particularly odd are others in my age group who say nothing, regardless of their vaccination status. All the best
They were also assisting police kidnapping elders from remote communities in the Northern Territory and taking them to the quarantine camp for forced vax.
Hope you are well rrodynmac. The only thing I like about EV's is the lack of toxic smells from petrol and diesel. Sure does make the air cleaner. But we need clean energy from fossil fuels, I think they can make it better but don't want to spend the money in improving air quality. EV's are also good if you have your own solar energy, saves you a lot of money. But I won't be able to afford one anytime soon. And because I rent there are no solar panels so defeats the purpose if I am still using the grid to charge up. Yes batteries are a big issue still, nees a lot of improving and they cost a bomb to replace if you need to.
AUKUS Covid-19 Australia, Canada, United Kingdom and the United States Military Operation - Not A Civil One. AUKUS supplying Nuclear Submarines to Australia too.
Senator Roberts points to the International Medical Countermeasures Consortium and states that covid was a [US DOD-lead] military operation (probably linked to The World Health Organisation through some unseen back door):
: Senator Malcolm Roberts’s speech August 9, 2023
As a servant to the many different people who make up our one Queensland community, tonight I speak to an aspect of COVID-19 I haven’t raised before. Information now in the public domain indicates the COVID response was not initiated through commercial interests but, rather, through an organisation called the Medical Countermeasures Consortium that Australia joined in 2012. According to Australia’s defence.gov.au website, the Medical Countermeasures Consortium is a four-nation partnership involving the defence and health departments of Australia, Canada, United Kingdom and the United States. ‘The consortium seeks to develop medical countermeasures to assist with … chemical and radiological threats affecting civilian and military populations and on emerging infectious diseases and pandemics.’ It includes drugs and diagnostics. Who knew we had a military pharmaceutical apparatus linking the United States, Australia, Canada and the UK, in place since the Gillard Labor government—an AUKUS for pandemics?
The consortium maintains a compensation scheme for people injured as a result of taking a countermeasure. Compensation claims were accepted for the 2009 H1N1 vaccine, the anthrax vaccine and flu vaccines. The medical countermeasures unit within the United States Department of Defense has been in the vaccine business for many years and has been injuring people for many years through GOF —and getting away with it. So it should come as no surprise that the American Department of Defense signed the first contract between the United States government and Pfizer for the purchase of $11 billion worth of vaccines. President Trump gave the order to the Department of Defense to commence vaccine development and even gave it a cool name: Operation Warp Speed.
The rest you will have to see on my free sustack - also a separate post recently - what is in the vaccines and their purpose (nanotechnology) and another post giving you a letter which you could use t orefuse vaccines including the Common Law for Australia on the right to refuse vaccines, etc
The elephant in the room is that, due it's fundamental flaws, it's a technology that's never been demonstrated to work that well, i.e. safely in the long term and effectively.
There's a reason it wasn't allowed to leave Kariko's lab for years and Moderna was heading for bankruptcy.
Fundamental flaws are many:
You need to turn down the immune system via PRRs using m1u to stop it being quickly destroyed. Unfortunately these immune pathways are exactly the ones you need to make good vaccines and especially for targeting tumors. You don't get IgA mucosal immunity. In other words it's second rate for both vaccines and cancer treatments, which is why trials have largely been a flop to date. The tumor or virus quickly evolves away from antigen specific responses, so you still need cancer surgery and to use existing treatments.
Dosing is another flaw as this is highly variable and difficult to control. Some tissues accumulate more than others, probably not the ones where you want it to target. And the LNP carriers are well known for their to accumulate for months in the liver & other organs, with cytotoxicity & inflammatory signalling.
Safety cannot be assessed adequately with the big sell of a rapid turnaround. 100 days is not long enough to detect long term conditions you may have initiated despite your best predictions - autoimmune disorders, cancers, class switching, PD-1 upregulation, endothelial damage, amyloidosis and so on. Our understanding of cellular pathways and how the immune system actually works still has many gaps.
Quality control is another issue they are aware of: Adulteration with dsRNA and plasmid DNA, SV40 promoters. The regulators still haven't even begun to address this. Done properly I suspect it either suppresses IFNb responses to get the immune response they want to show shareholders and would probably render most of the production uneconomic. But it could be done and needs to happen.
If it works so well please release all the records from last time and do the same again over at least ten years, at no greater than small scale stage 2, not a mass EUA.
You have lost the publics trust, quite rightly due to repeated failure to own up, take responsibility, release the data and properly compensate the injured or families of the dead.
You deserve utter contempt and it's your job to try to earn it back over a long period, not treat us all like fools, doubling down and pretending it will all come good when the evidence is abundant that it's a failed tech, apart from for some specific applications.
Yes, the Garvan and Kirby institutes as well. As for Macquarie University, I’ll be writing to its Vice-Chancellor, S. Bruce Dowton, with much of the evidence against the jabs including the new GMO video from Julian Gillespie’s Substack and AMPS’ study into excess deaths. I now only focus on the mRNA shots, nothing else; Dowton and others like him may worry about themselves and their loved ones if they’ve taken them. Things might start to change then.
If we end up with a social credit system, then hopefully it will be without these dreaded injections.
Yes - digitised compliance. Hopefully, we won’t get to the stage of riots in major cities around the world, as with the Poll Tax riots in London: https://youtu.be/I4QQN2aqeKA?si=wd5XrCU7KR7vDhLn
Only just discovered this shocking news of Macquarie's collusion-in-culling, made even more shocking by the fact that I spent fourteen years at Macquarie both as a student and then tutoring and lecturing in the School of Biological Sciences. Thank you for this alert, your excellent investigative journalism, and for holding a Forest on the very demolition site! During my time associated with academia I watched the gutting and destruction of universities as institutes of learning by the government withdrawal of funding, turning academics into intellectual prostitutes for "public-private-partnership-pimps", churning out papers and grant proposals at the expense of their teaching. Thirty years down the track they don't even seem to mind producing transfection-poisons for a living. Makes me sick to the stomach. So glad I got out of that soul-destroying machinery.
yes i remember that happening to the universities, too. They used to be for educating the next generation and for academic inquiry and exploratory learning and research.... then after the 1990s it became all about industry. They became factories churning out degrees for cash
I have seen your interview with Dr. John Campbell. I love Forest of the Fallen.
I don't understand the idea of only paid subscribers allowed to post on some of your articles. That is typically the practice of those spreading mis and disinformation. Maybe you should reconsider this? You did mention with John not being able to see dissenting views, which is what this practice does.
Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs ever produced by Big Pharma. 100 times safer than aspirin or Tylenol with hardly any drug interactions to speak of. There is a moderate interaction with warfarin (blood thinner). But then, there are many drug interactions with warfarin, including interactions with many foods...
Dr. Yeadon cannot be trusted, period. Not after his ridiculous statement on Ivermectin. He is using his 40 years of expertise to deceive and mislead... https://substack.com/@ohbaby/note/c-67552347
Viruses exists. They are collected, cataloged, and stockpiled in storage facilities across Eastern Europe to this day. They are isolated and purified as required for therapeutic administration. These are the facts. Nothing anyone says can make these facts disappear...
As I have said, nothing anyone says can make these facts disappear. Doesn't anyone click links anymore?
Phages are actually the smallest size viruses there are. They would have to be to infect bacteria. And there are more bacteria in your gut, than there are cells in the human body. So to say, phages are not harmful or helpful to humans is a huge misnomer. Please look over the evidence before commenting. And the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been thoroughly photographed. You'd have to be living under a rock not to know this. There are photographs everywhere.
And no matter what Dr. Yeadon produces it's complete bullshit. Why do I say that? Cause it can't supersede 40 years of the historical record. As in historical fact.
Dr. Yeadon is not the Ringmaster of the Greatest Show on Earth. He is at best, nothing but a side clown to be laughed at. My disdain towards someone who knows better, could not be greater.
hi there, thanks for that -- me I don't have any paid subscribers, all my work on substack is free. You might have confused a cross post - cross posting is when I share another person's substack here. They may have paid subscribers on their substack.
Dr Mike Yeadon - he might change his mind this way or that, but he's still a man of 40 years' expertise in drug discovery so no matter what he thinks about some other topic here or there, he still has something of value to say. Yes I saw he said Ivermectin was a sterilising agent, and Dr Tess Lawrie I think rebutted it. Disagreement over science is normal.
Yes I disagree with the idea that there are no viruses, what else is chicken pox etc?
You are correct about cross posting, and I was mistaken. Sorry about that. I learn something new everyday. It's strange though viewers reading someone else's post on your site, can't comment on it here.
He still has something of value?
A man's character is judged by his good deeds. To mislead and deceive hardly fall in that category. He knows better. He's a career scientist for crying out loud. I have more disdain for him knowing he has 40 years of expertise. He's using his experience as a platform to spread disinformation. Oh,.. I'm a former Big Pharma exec, in charge of blah, blah, blah, so I know...
Dr. Yeadon misleading that church group, saying there is no virus and Ivermectin is toxic, could be very harmful. Strangely, it reminds me of Jim Jones and the "Jonestown" event.
This however might. The risks are great and success isn't guaranteed but I am increasingly of the opinion that this is one of the only very few viable ways out:
change is slow but the slow and peaceful way is the only real way to get it done. Voting now will not change we have to build a political opposition. Start by joining one of the civil rights lobby groups that are not doing their jobs, like NSW Council For Civil Liberties. Just by being present and showing up then we can remove the vacuum that allowed them to be taken over by people who don't care about bodily autonomy and free speech. You'd be surprised how much power those groups have, and how few people are running them. They get listened to, where your vote right now does not. So join them. We have a right to be represented.
While the Federal government, both coalition and now ALP has been seeking to prevent publications exposing the "covid scam" I commenced to expose on 8 April 2020 to the Victorian Ombudsman and on 13 April 2020 to the Victorian Human Rights Commission as well as to federal and state politicians that the MANDATES were unconstitutional. IBAC on 19 April 2020 held that it was not of "public interest". This year I learned that one of my adult sons was coerced in having the jabs and is given 2 years to live. I pursue to hold the politicians and their collaborators legally accountable for the mass murder, crimes against humanity, etc. Since 6 August 2021, I commenced to lodge my complaint to the Australian Federal Police, but it too blatantly ignored this. Well more than 7,000 pages is the complaint so far. Then LAWFARE ended upon my wife and I, and trespassing (climbing over the fence), etc, and my wife ended up scared to death in a wheelchair and last month passed away. I am on a mission of legal accountability and will continue to do so. As a self0educated constitutionalist I ion 19 July 2006 defeated the Commonwealth and 9 Attorney-Generals in two cases in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka (representing myself). I stopped paying the unconstitutional "council rates" for various reasons! You can read it up at my blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati. (I do not charge for downloading!). My motto is; MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®.
The signs not only shows "ENTRY PROHBITED" but sites 5 court judgments but the so called ""Law Enforcement agency" holds they are above the law. About a week before my wife died, they claim I was speeding by 6 km and issued a $275 fine. By 31 October they claimed it was a massive $24,018.90 and I lodged a complaint that the next day 1 November they reduced it to $662.40. Just that as a constitutionalist they picked upon the wrong person! Nothing can rectify the suffering of my wife, but I certainly can pursue to hold them legally accountable. After all, if they did it to use they can do it to others, like the "covid scam" and I am determined to make sure that we avoid a repeat!
What was fascinating to me was how COVID changed my own behaviour. I didn't HAVE to restrict myself to a 15 minute zone around my house - but I did. The more they COVID'd, the closer I stayed to home. My map of comfort has shrunk; I already live in a 15 minute city, even though it's not enforced. Just a matter of throwing some switches to make it firm.
On 16 April 2025, backdating to 10 April 2025, Centrelink suspended my Age Pension payments I had since June 2007, which I view is another form of TERRORISM to try to break me for daring to expose their misuse/abuse of powers. My blog at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati sets out matters. In months before my (now late) wife passed away we were terrorized by Banyule City Council repeatedly climbing over fences, vandalizing her legally parked motor vehicle, damaging private property, causing physical harm to my wife, etc. the more they do the more I am determine and pursue to hold them legally accountable! it is only when people stand up for their rights that the evil doers discover they no longer have their assumed power!
HANSARD 22-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON: Let this speech do for the referendum also.
Mr. TRENWITH: I say with these evidences of the desire on the part of the people for more freedom, for greater facilities for giving effect to the popular will, we ought to make provision in this Constitution by which the will of the people can become law. If we do that we shall be doing something which will make it more certain that this Constitution will be adopted by the people.
END QUOTE
.
Hansard 1-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention),
QUOTE Mr. OCONNER (New South Wales).-
Because, as has been said before, it is [start page 357] necessary not only that the administration of justice should be pure and above suspicion, but that it should be beyond the possibility of suspicion;
END QUOTE
HANSARD 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.-Our civil rights are not in the hands of any Government, but the rights of the Crown in prosecuting criminals are.
END QUOTE
The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
for the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE
.
HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
END QUOTE
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
END QUOTE
And
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
END QUOTE
And
Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it must in its very essence be a free Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary that is secured in the very way in which the freedom of the British Constitution is secured. It is secured by vesting in the people, through their representatives, the power of the purse, and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of securing absolute freedom to a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than that which we contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect the citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily government of the country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom is the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution. There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every one has sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people. We have provided for a Judiciary, which will determine questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions which should be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
END QUOTE
When we have a unlawful court system and an Attorney-Generals who seem to me to be incompetent as a First Law Officer then this may underline how sick our legal system truly is.
https://www.scribd.com/document/871326508/20250604-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Justice-Amanda-Chambers-CJ-County-Court-of-Victoria
Our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) itself is our BILL OF RIGHTS and let no one rob you of those rights!
yes me too.
My view is, that the contracts with the pharmaceutical companies were unconstitutional and this means that pharmaceutical companies can be held legally accountable for the harm inflicted upon Australians. As for politicians: Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
END QUOTE
The Commonwealth still exist but the politicians are pretending otherwise. As long as we do not accept their nonsense and TREASON we will continue to have the Commonwealth as provided by the Framers of the Constitution. As I proved in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka on 19 July 2006 (representing myself) that the Commonwealth DPP and the 9 Attorney-Generals couldn't defeat me! And this underlines that as long as you stand your ground they more than likely find not to have the power they held they had!
🙏 rrodynmac
I was a donkey last time, but I might draw a picture, next time.
good point about public servants. Colonisation was a bit more complex however, some of it was brutal notably in Tasmania, but other areas it was simply settlement and a meeting of two cultures. The last of the Pintupi walked out of the Western Desert in 1984 and were angry their relatives hadn't told them about the supermarket for example. They'd never seen glass before. I have read some of the earliest newspapers when Sydney as a colony was only 15 years old and it's quite interesting to read the earliest interactions. They mostly centred around food. Aboriginal people liked the new foods, the melons, the sheep. The British tried to get them into farming and homestead living. There was cultural exchange that was not at all brutal or exploitative going on there, too.
And here's the thing - remember the 60's, when the UK decided that Australia was their very own personal nuclear test site?
I don't see these mRNA plants proliferating in the US - and certainly not at the per-capita level that it is happening here! I think they got a case of NIMBY.
Interestingly, regarding IV bags. A friend who worked for Tuta Laboratories in Australia says we were making plastic blood bags in the 1980s before the company was taken over by a foreign firm then sold overseas because there was no government support to keep the industry in Australia. The misallocation of mountains of tax dollars to the mRNA ecosystem going on now is all subject to public-private partnerships. The model is to team up a university with a Big Pharma company and the government funding. But who gets to profit when the public pays? The company? The contracts are suspiciously secret. There's no transparency. So what if an Australian university helps invent a product if the company takes the patent rights. And again - a mountain of money is being redirected to a technology that is not as useful or safe as advertised, at the expense of the basic needs of the citizens.
There's a link to a reference to Tuta Laboraties of Lane Cove in a patent application here: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0177859B1/en
And we know who will be getting the profits - not us!
Like the mining industry, our governments feed these companies with funding (either directly or via tax breaks) and let them keep the profits for themselves (perhaps one or two or several of our politicians will have substantial share-holdings). We the people are supposed to be grateful for the jobs they are creating...
That's on top of all the concerns about the mRNA technology, which is an outrage in itself.
But are any of us surprised?
Who exactly will survive the jabs to fill those killer jobs? I wonder...
The robots
Australia is embarrassingly short of the essential medical supplies which we no longer know how to make for ourselves as per here: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/intravenous-fluid-shortage-sparks-10fold-jump-in-costs/news-story/7d556ceeacf3656b73e3700e3a13e797
No surprise. In the US, everything was made here. Since companies moved out since 1990's, we manufacture very little at all here. It's not by accident, & it's really difficult to compete with slave labor elsewhere. So many old name companies are no longer producing dependable appliances for instance. American made hot water heaters lasted decades, but nearly all made in Red China now, average life is 10 years as opposed to my personal experience of an American made water heater lasting 42 yrs, replaced in end of 2012, & already replaced with a new one again in 2023. Same experience with an electric stove, already have replaced twice. It's ridiculous!
Anytime I see a shortage in Australia, at first I thought "supply chain" and "tyranny of distance."
But when it became essential medicines, a little light went off in my brain: What if it is because they want to reformulate essential medicines to ensure that we all get the nanotech?
Saline is one of the products which Dr. David Nixon has grown some little nano-beasties from.
When you see "shortage," think "reformulation."
Most if not all products now contain nefarious substances. Go back to the basics whenever possible; grow your own food and/or network with like minded people to find locally grown/raised items (Fred of pesticides and j a bs. Even the municipal water is unsafe. Add Geoengineering into the mix and it’s a toxic soup to say the least. Humans must unite against our extermination or our species will perish.
Cannot find the UNSUBSCRIBE "box" would you kindly remove me from your site.,
NOTE;
Australia has had Bioweapon Labs for years, well before the 2020 debacle.
Man y people suffer from the effecst of aerosol Bio weapons. Since 1981 the number of rare diseases and chronic illnesses in Australia had increased,
Hello Gumnut, to be honest I don’t know how to unsubscribe you. It should say on the email you get, so just follow the directions Substack has.
This is brilliant, thank you Alison... Yet again I'll be forwarding this article... Great work... These factories are sinister, not only in their funding, but the fact they are manufacturing something that's been proven to cause death and injury... It's very concept has death and injury written all over it...
These factories scare the crap out of me, like they're wanting an endless inescapable supply of this rubbish.
Even if you were super pro vax, I mean "super super pro vax", surely the fact that an Adelaide professor had what sounds like an extremely viable non mRNA vaccine for covid, you'd have to question why did our government not throw money into that?
That would have meant local jobs, money for the government, and ongoing development of a local product. Yet not only was this guy silenced and censored, he was actively fined $300,000 by the TGA for uttering his vaccine's name!? Think about that... All we heard on the news was Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca etc. BEFORE the products were on the market, with representatives of that company talking up their products... Yet the local guy was fined $300,000 and ignored, perhaps even gaslighted by our own government.
Even though none of the vaxs could ever possibly work by the sounds of things (stimulation of IgG antibodies rather than IgA antibodies) as per Professor Steele's statements - Australian Molecular and Cellular Immunologist, Geneticist & Microbiologist ( https://rumble.com/vn9tgl-aust.-prof.-edward-steele-immunologist-pharma-gov-lies-and-jabs-cant-work.-.html )
Seeing all this unfolding I feel like I'm in some alternative reality at the moment, something akin to invasion of the body snatchers where everyone is in the cult and there's only a few of us left for them to conquer. I can't believe so many are going along with it all. Especially scientists.
It’s all about money and gene technology changing our God given genes. And death from these things
I heard recently on a cafe locked out podcast that a Victorian gp who was raided by police and patient files taken and suspended by AHPRA that AHPRA was not acting under a law, but under a memorandum of understanding with the health department. That would make all of their oppressive actions illegal?
Sadly I was coerced, had one Pfizer and am vax free injured- pericarditis permanent heard damage and other issues. I went to one of Dan Andrews hubs - guess what no batch number on my vax card
I’m ok my neurones are still synapsing most of the time. Last 3 years have been tough, accepting loss but f quality is f life, and realising I’m probably living on borrowed time time. Emotionally it’s been hard to stay positive and motivation waxes and wanes. Overall I can’t really complain I’m not dead and soon to be 72 I’ve had a life- good bad and ugly unlike the relatively younger people who are living with crippling outcomes and will never have a normal life.
Shame on these Basditios who did this to you Julie and the many others who believed the corporate grubberment lies. May they rot in hell.
Don't give in, stand strong, take the known natural preventives and believe in yourself. I note your replies/viewing points in many substacks and I appreciate your input.
You are more worthy than these Parasitic Basditios who deem us their slaves. They have no clue what awaits them.
sorry to hear that Julie, I am so sorry. I wish I could make it better in some way but I can't. You could join Dr Melissa McCann's class action perhaps? Court date is due in December
yep they don't like us one bit. I went to Lizard Island where you can camp on the barrier reef... and i saw their culture in microcosm. What they want is for the billionaires in their private resort waited on hand and foot. They want only so many young and good looking servants to cook and clean and drive them around, and take them out in the boat. Then the Museum research station is on the island also. They love it because they get proximity to the billionaires in the private resort. They run tours for them. The billionaires love the scientists because they get to feel super privileged and smart.
then because it's public land, they can't own it, the barrier reef is a national park, there's a token campsite for boaties and the public. less than 15m from the water (crocodile threat) with no running water. You're told in no uncertain terms not to go anywhere near the private resort they don't want to see or hear YOU the public.
and that's the template. that's the 15-minute cities. We will be herded into a pen so the the billionaires don't have to look at us or feel like we're chewing up "their" resources or living on "their" wide open land.
and the science elite gets to go along and feel like they're billionaires too
Check out Kate Mason substack she has a lot of information about land transfer and plans of local, state and fed gov. Plus I think the move to give Indigenous people land back is only temporary, they will steel it back once it is out of private and state ownership. I heard that hikers in the blue mountains have found 80% of trails have been closed with signs warning you not to enter. It is really happening and fast, scary stuff. It is time to act now, move to vote for the right people in local councils for starters.
sounds awful i hope they have a good lawyer
thank you steve, super kind. Yes i know what you mean by feeling like we lurched into some alternate reality. These factories are a bad sign particularly the melbourne one. You don't have to look far to see the hand of Barda, the militarised arm of US Health and Human Services behind the push for all this, and CEPI of course (which is to say Bill Gates and WEF and WHO)
💉On forced vaccination (Cairns News): https://cairnsnews.org/2024/08/16/un-personnel-have-complete-immunity-if-they-come-knocking-on-your-door-with-a-syringe-or-ak47/
Thank you for this information.
No idea, rrodynmac. I did subscribe, so perhaps it’s an auto-generated response from Substack.
Not as yet, Finn, no. I’ve mainly been looking at o/s productions, such as Vera Sharav’s 5 part series Never Again is Now Global and others, as well as interviews and papers.
Thank you for the link. Here is a link to Vera Sharav’s 5 part series: https://in.childrenshealthdefense.org/medical-freedom/never-again-is-now-global/
For awake people who are still working, I don’t blame them for not going any further. What I find particularly odd are others in my age group who say nothing, regardless of their vaccination status. All the best
Yes so many hidden identities, especially the guys in green at around 1:14 in this video... What force is that?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/64IHtOCrukEL
They were also assisting police kidnapping elders from remote communities in the Northern Territory and taking them to the quarantine camp for forced vax.
They had UN troops in the NT during COVID- abducting elderly aboriginals from remote communities, taking them to quarantine for forced vax
Thanks, Julie. The trickle-down corruption is immense.
thanks for posting i will look
Thank you. I recently watched your interview by Dr John Campbell. I hope to meet you guys in Centennial Park one day. Oz Dave
PS This Disinformation Playbook document (Melbourne) is also concerning: https://www.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/5060724/Disinformation-in-the-City-Reponse-Playbook_compressed-1.pdf?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1W6wMXW1BVpdXn_NNQkuNK3UIAlDXSkJyLssi4GDgXiiHVJGmj2W6vElo_aem_lAwogU3Wju_47-v6_-w5WQ
Thanks, rrodynmac. Yes, all this is very time-consuming. Some of your message is not showing by the way. Cheers
The climate change grifters have been pulling scams for Public moneys for the last 10? 20? years.
No surprises here that these clowns are doing the same thing.
Scamming the Gov for funding is a tried and true get rich quick scheme.
The fossil fuel industry are the only ones who are going to keep our lights on and enough power to generate for electric vehicles.
Hope you are well rrodynmac. The only thing I like about EV's is the lack of toxic smells from petrol and diesel. Sure does make the air cleaner. But we need clean energy from fossil fuels, I think they can make it better but don't want to spend the money in improving air quality. EV's are also good if you have your own solar energy, saves you a lot of money. But I won't be able to afford one anytime soon. And because I rent there are no solar panels so defeats the purpose if I am still using the grid to charge up. Yes batteries are a big issue still, nees a lot of improving and they cost a bomb to replace if you need to.
AUKUS Covid-19 Australia, Canada, United Kingdom and the United States Military Operation - Not A Civil One. AUKUS supplying Nuclear Submarines to Australia too.
Senator Roberts points to the International Medical Countermeasures Consortium and states that covid was a [US DOD-lead] military operation (probably linked to The World Health Organisation through some unseen back door):
: Senator Malcolm Roberts’s speech August 9, 2023
As a servant to the many different people who make up our one Queensland community, tonight I speak to an aspect of COVID-19 I haven’t raised before. Information now in the public domain indicates the COVID response was not initiated through commercial interests but, rather, through an organisation called the Medical Countermeasures Consortium that Australia joined in 2012. According to Australia’s defence.gov.au website, the Medical Countermeasures Consortium is a four-nation partnership involving the defence and health departments of Australia, Canada, United Kingdom and the United States. ‘The consortium seeks to develop medical countermeasures to assist with … chemical and radiological threats affecting civilian and military populations and on emerging infectious diseases and pandemics.’ It includes drugs and diagnostics. Who knew we had a military pharmaceutical apparatus linking the United States, Australia, Canada and the UK, in place since the Gillard Labor government—an AUKUS for pandemics?
The consortium maintains a compensation scheme for people injured as a result of taking a countermeasure. Compensation claims were accepted for the 2009 H1N1 vaccine, the anthrax vaccine and flu vaccines. The medical countermeasures unit within the United States Department of Defense has been in the vaccine business for many years and has been injuring people for many years through GOF —and getting away with it. So it should come as no surprise that the American Department of Defense signed the first contract between the United States government and Pfizer for the purchase of $11 billion worth of vaccines. President Trump gave the order to the Department of Defense to commence vaccine development and even gave it a cool name: Operation Warp Speed.
The rest you will have to see on my free sustack - also a separate post recently - what is in the vaccines and their purpose (nanotechnology) and another post giving you a letter which you could use t orefuse vaccines including the Common Law for Australia on the right to refuse vaccines, etc
That said, interesting post and thanks.
The elephant in the room is that, due it's fundamental flaws, it's a technology that's never been demonstrated to work that well, i.e. safely in the long term and effectively.
There's a reason it wasn't allowed to leave Kariko's lab for years and Moderna was heading for bankruptcy.
Fundamental flaws are many:
You need to turn down the immune system via PRRs using m1u to stop it being quickly destroyed. Unfortunately these immune pathways are exactly the ones you need to make good vaccines and especially for targeting tumors. You don't get IgA mucosal immunity. In other words it's second rate for both vaccines and cancer treatments, which is why trials have largely been a flop to date. The tumor or virus quickly evolves away from antigen specific responses, so you still need cancer surgery and to use existing treatments.
Dosing is another flaw as this is highly variable and difficult to control. Some tissues accumulate more than others, probably not the ones where you want it to target. And the LNP carriers are well known for their to accumulate for months in the liver & other organs, with cytotoxicity & inflammatory signalling.
Safety cannot be assessed adequately with the big sell of a rapid turnaround. 100 days is not long enough to detect long term conditions you may have initiated despite your best predictions - autoimmune disorders, cancers, class switching, PD-1 upregulation, endothelial damage, amyloidosis and so on. Our understanding of cellular pathways and how the immune system actually works still has many gaps.
Quality control is another issue they are aware of: Adulteration with dsRNA and plasmid DNA, SV40 promoters. The regulators still haven't even begun to address this. Done properly I suspect it either suppresses IFNb responses to get the immune response they want to show shareholders and would probably render most of the production uneconomic. But it could be done and needs to happen.
If it works so well please release all the records from last time and do the same again over at least ten years, at no greater than small scale stage 2, not a mass EUA.
You have lost the publics trust, quite rightly due to repeated failure to own up, take responsibility, release the data and properly compensate the injured or families of the dead.
You deserve utter contempt and it's your job to try to earn it back over a long period, not treat us all like fools, doubling down and pretending it will all come good when the evidence is abundant that it's a failed tech, apart from for some specific applications.
excellent comment thank you for clearly stating so many of the exact things that are the problem with mRNA
Yeah - what is so promising about this tech that we are spending $,$$$,$$$,$$$ on it?
I suspect it is to get programming into every human on the planet, after all, we are only meat puppets.
great story
🇦🇺💉”Don’t delay COVID-19 booster vaccination, study reveals” ~ Doherty Institute, 29 August 2024: https://www.doherty.edu.au/news-events/news/dont-delay-covid-19-booster-vaccination-study-reveals
oh wow, they are at it relentlessly... doherty are plugged in to the mRNA rewards machine
Yes, the Garvan and Kirby institutes as well. As for Macquarie University, I’ll be writing to its Vice-Chancellor, S. Bruce Dowton, with much of the evidence against the jabs including the new GMO video from Julian Gillespie’s Substack and AMPS’ study into excess deaths. I now only focus on the mRNA shots, nothing else; Dowton and others like him may worry about themselves and their loved ones if they’ve taken them. Things might start to change then.
If we end up with a social credit system, then hopefully it will be without these dreaded injections.
Thanks Alison
Sadly, the injections were the loyalty test. They will be central to what's next.
WHY build all this industry, when there is no demand? It's the weirdest thing....
Yes - digitised compliance. Hopefully, we won’t get to the stage of riots in major cities around the world, as with the Poll Tax riots in London: https://youtu.be/I4QQN2aqeKA?si=wd5XrCU7KR7vDhLn
Only just discovered this shocking news of Macquarie's collusion-in-culling, made even more shocking by the fact that I spent fourteen years at Macquarie both as a student and then tutoring and lecturing in the School of Biological Sciences. Thank you for this alert, your excellent investigative journalism, and for holding a Forest on the very demolition site! During my time associated with academia I watched the gutting and destruction of universities as institutes of learning by the government withdrawal of funding, turning academics into intellectual prostitutes for "public-private-partnership-pimps", churning out papers and grant proposals at the expense of their teaching. Thirty years down the track they don't even seem to mind producing transfection-poisons for a living. Makes me sick to the stomach. So glad I got out of that soul-destroying machinery.
yes i remember that happening to the universities, too. They used to be for educating the next generation and for academic inquiry and exploratory learning and research.... then after the 1990s it became all about industry. They became factories churning out degrees for cash
I have seen your interview with Dr. John Campbell. I love Forest of the Fallen.
I don't understand the idea of only paid subscribers allowed to post on some of your articles. That is typically the practice of those spreading mis and disinformation. Maybe you should reconsider this? You did mention with John not being able to see dissenting views, which is what this practice does.
Also, you might reconsider Dr. Mike Yeadon's substack recommendation. The man has lost his mind. The big pharma exec turned truther, is now back to being a big pharma hand puppet. And to think, he was once featured in the excellent documentary, Ivermectin: The Truth… https://rumble.com/v1hu7xr-the-truth-about-ivermectin-a-new-short-documentary-by-plandemic-filmmaker-m.html
He is now in the no virus camp, and thinks Ivermectin is a fertility toxin. He has lost his mind.... https://substack.com/@ohbaby/note/c-67552347
I don't think you want to be promoting his substack any longer. I have some of the same excellent recommendations as you.
Keep up the good work.
Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs ever produced by Big Pharma. 100 times safer than aspirin or Tylenol with hardly any drug interactions to speak of. There is a moderate interaction with warfarin (blood thinner). But then, there are many drug interactions with warfarin, including interactions with many foods...
https://www.drugs.com/drug-interactions/warfarin.html
https://www.drugs.com/drug-interactions/ivermectin.html
This post is perhaps my best work. As no one has made the comparison I made in this article, regarding Ivermectin's incredible safety, using publicly available data.... https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/ivermectin-stats-and-side-effects
Dr. Yeadon cannot be trusted, period. Not after his ridiculous statement on Ivermectin. He is using his 40 years of expertise to deceive and mislead... https://substack.com/@ohbaby/note/c-67552347
Viruses exists. They are collected, cataloged, and stockpiled in storage facilities across Eastern Europe to this day. They are isolated and purified as required for therapeutic administration. These are the facts. Nothing anyone says can make these facts disappear...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493185/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3109452/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTqJITdpMko
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I64iBINOI-Y
Viruses infect bacteria as well as people, animals, and even plant life. We wouldn't exist without them.
As I have said, nothing anyone says can make these facts disappear. Doesn't anyone click links anymore?
Phages are actually the smallest size viruses there are. They would have to be to infect bacteria. And there are more bacteria in your gut, than there are cells in the human body. So to say, phages are not harmful or helpful to humans is a huge misnomer. Please look over the evidence before commenting. And the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been thoroughly photographed. You'd have to be living under a rock not to know this. There are photographs everywhere.
And no matter what Dr. Yeadon produces it's complete bullshit. Why do I say that? Cause it can't supersede 40 years of the historical record. As in historical fact.
I think if you looked at the evidence I provided, you would agree. It's irrefutable. Again here is the link... https://substack.com/@ohbaby/note/c-67552347
This isn't some novel vaccine with question marks about its safety. This med has been proven safe for decades on end. One of the safest pharmaceuticals ever produced.... https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/ivermectin-stats-and-side-effects
Dr. Yeadon is not the Ringmaster of the Greatest Show on Earth. He is at best, nothing but a side clown to be laughed at. My disdain towards someone who knows better, could not be greater.
hi there, thanks for that -- me I don't have any paid subscribers, all my work on substack is free. You might have confused a cross post - cross posting is when I share another person's substack here. They may have paid subscribers on their substack.
Dr Mike Yeadon - he might change his mind this way or that, but he's still a man of 40 years' expertise in drug discovery so no matter what he thinks about some other topic here or there, he still has something of value to say. Yes I saw he said Ivermectin was a sterilising agent, and Dr Tess Lawrie I think rebutted it. Disagreement over science is normal.
Yes I disagree with the idea that there are no viruses, what else is chicken pox etc?
You are correct about cross posting, and I was mistaken. Sorry about that. I learn something new everyday. It's strange though viewers reading someone else's post on your site, can't comment on it here.
He still has something of value?
A man's character is judged by his good deeds. To mislead and deceive hardly fall in that category. He knows better. He's a career scientist for crying out loud. I have more disdain for him knowing he has 40 years of expertise. He's using his experience as a platform to spread disinformation. Oh,.. I'm a former Big Pharma exec, in charge of blah, blah, blah, so I know...
Dr. Yeadon misleading that church group, saying there is no virus and Ivermectin is toxic, could be very harmful. Strangely, it reminds me of Jim Jones and the "Jonestown" event.
Why It's Important Everyone Should Have Ivermectin Handy https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/why-everyone-should-have-ivermectin
He will never debate with Tess. She would rip him a new butthole and he knows it. You saw what she did to Dr. Andrew Hill.... https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/my-letter-to-dr-andrew-hill-video
It was kind of you to reply, thanks.
Petitions and voting will NEVER fix that...EVER!
This however might. The risks are great and success isn't guaranteed but I am increasingly of the opinion that this is one of the only very few viable ways out:
https://www.badquaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FieldManualNo1.pdf
change is slow but the slow and peaceful way is the only real way to get it done. Voting now will not change we have to build a political opposition. Start by joining one of the civil rights lobby groups that are not doing their jobs, like NSW Council For Civil Liberties. Just by being present and showing up then we can remove the vacuum that allowed them to be taken over by people who don't care about bodily autonomy and free speech. You'd be surprised how much power those groups have, and how few people are running them. They get listened to, where your vote right now does not. So join them. We have a right to be represented.
I hear you Alison but here is the main problem I see:
Slow is unfortunately a big problem for us as we are quickly running out of time.
We are four years into this and our side has had ZERO wins on the board while the other side still has all the initiative.
Australia WILL have mandatory digital ID at some point in 2025. This is a certainty.
Time's up!
While the Federal government, both coalition and now ALP has been seeking to prevent publications exposing the "covid scam" I commenced to expose on 8 April 2020 to the Victorian Ombudsman and on 13 April 2020 to the Victorian Human Rights Commission as well as to federal and state politicians that the MANDATES were unconstitutional. IBAC on 19 April 2020 held that it was not of "public interest". This year I learned that one of my adult sons was coerced in having the jabs and is given 2 years to live. I pursue to hold the politicians and their collaborators legally accountable for the mass murder, crimes against humanity, etc. Since 6 August 2021, I commenced to lodge my complaint to the Australian Federal Police, but it too blatantly ignored this. Well more than 7,000 pages is the complaint so far. Then LAWFARE ended upon my wife and I, and trespassing (climbing over the fence), etc, and my wife ended up scared to death in a wheelchair and last month passed away. I am on a mission of legal accountability and will continue to do so. As a self0educated constitutionalist I ion 19 July 2006 defeated the Commonwealth and 9 Attorney-Generals in two cases in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka (representing myself). I stopped paying the unconstitutional "council rates" for various reasons! You can read it up at my blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati. (I do not charge for downloading!). My motto is; MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®.
The signs not only shows "ENTRY PROHBITED" but sites 5 court judgments but the so called ""Law Enforcement agency" holds they are above the law. About a week before my wife died, they claim I was speeding by 6 km and issued a $275 fine. By 31 October they claimed it was a massive $24,018.90 and I lodged a complaint that the next day 1 November they reduced it to $662.40. Just that as a constitutionalist they picked upon the wrong person! Nothing can rectify the suffering of my wife, but I certainly can pursue to hold them legally accountable. After all, if they did it to use they can do it to others, like the "covid scam" and I am determined to make sure that we avoid a repeat!