Nice to see an anonymous troll from the fake-name Fleming collection posting here.
For those who can't see when he/she gets deleted and blocked:
Nosairee Bob! posted the comment "Cry more, tin foil hat f*ckwit"
The Nosairee Bob! fake profile description is: "Why did you come here to find nothing out? Stupid c*nt, *This bio is for the attention of white, right wing losers only."
Another brave Antifa warrior from so-called Australia fighting the Nazi white supremacists via a super brave fake name because they are in SO much physical danger OMG it's like it's WWII again and they are the underground French Resistance.
Or Spanish Civil War warriors fighting Franco's fascist forces in 1936 Madrid! No Pasaran!
Their brave exploits include ruining the tiny political events of 81-year-old stroke survivors and getting dissenting medical experts cancelled during covid.
So where are these neo-fascist activist book authors getting their money from? Who is organising them? They didn’t just suddenly appear from nowhere.
Rule Number One about understanding ideology is to comprehend that nothing in politics happens by accident. There is no such thing as a spontaneous political movement that just pops up and grows organically. Like everyday party politics, these sorts of ideological pop-up projects require money - truckloads of money. So who is funding them? Following the money trail to its source is the first and most effective step in cutting the heads off these neo-fascist snakes. Their intent is clear - to progress the collapse of Australian society. But on whose behalf are they acting? Let us do a bit of investigating.
As working journos, they got a book deal from Ultimo Press. IDK who paid the thousands for the Pete Evans retreat. Poor Pete Evans - his life was totally destroyed by the covid fascism, and he tries to rebuild it positively. And they do this to him.
IDK if Ultimo Press paid for that or if they got a government grant - it would have been a good question at Waverley Library event to ask, but I very respectfully waited till the end and you only get one question.
“ This is not evidence of Australian racism, it’s evidence of poor quality control at Melbourne universities.”
Understatement of the Day. (Maybe year)
It’s absolutely ironic that the refutation of points in your article takes far more space than the review of the trash.
Brenton Tarrant was SEVEN YEARS AGO and still they harp back to it because it’s all they’ve got.🤦🏻♀️
From 2013 to April 2024 there have been 56413 attacks by Muslim extremists with 204937 DEAD. Tarrant is really only comparable now to a trans school shooter. 🙄
oh yes, the far-left have got the solitary actors Brenton Tarrant and Norwegian Anders Breivik. Vile mass murderers but hardly part of a mass movement.
They try to shoehorn Wieambilla in to pad the list even though Wieambilla was flat out mental illness.
These are the three murderous events they harp on in all the parliamentary submissions.
If you read that parliamentary submission co-written by cam smith and jordan mcswiney above, you will see "far-right" and "Christchurch" for page after page, creating sub-categories of "radical far-right" and "extreme far-right" and generally over-analysing and catastrophising anyone who votes One Nation or likes the flag or Australia Day. Any "so-called Australian" basically.
They don't totally ignore the Islamist murders of 15 people at Bondi, less than 2 months before their submission, but it is contextualised to oblivion in a much smaller mention down below Christchurch, and "Islam" is minimised out of it as much as possible - despite the fact that Islamism really was the ideologically motivating factor in the Bondi attack, and it really is part of a larger ideological movement as evidenced by Islamic State's enthusiastic praise of the attack in their newsletter.
The same cannot be said of Tarrant and Breivik.
But the left are simply horrified by the unfairness of how many Islamist groups are considered terrorist threats. It seems so unfair when everyone is equal, right? Right? Must be "racism".
It's because they have no idea about Islam and need to read TheReligionOfPeace.com and watch some lectures by Robert Spencer of JihadWatch.
ps; I'm so glad you read that part. Please do click on the link and read that terrible paper that calls all of Convoy To Canberra white supremacists.
I went to that protest, caught the train down, got there just as it was ending. There were definitely more than 100,000 people streaming off the hill and not one of the people that I saw was in any way racist.
Some of them had terrible burns, however, underneath their shirts, one man's was shaped like a neat red oblong on his chest. These remain unexplained to this day, by authoriites.
You know, I was impressed that Cam Wilson is indeed trying to make the world a better place by preventing people floating off from reality. The problem as i see it, is that there is an echo chamber - the milieu has shifted journalist perceptions.
Nice to see an anonymous troll from the fake-name Fleming collection posting here.
For those who can't see when he/she gets deleted and blocked:
Nosairee Bob! posted the comment "Cry more, tin foil hat f*ckwit"
The Nosairee Bob! fake profile description is: "Why did you come here to find nothing out? Stupid c*nt, *This bio is for the attention of white, right wing losers only."
Another brave Antifa warrior from so-called Australia fighting the Nazi white supremacists via a super brave fake name because they are in SO much physical danger OMG it's like it's WWII again and they are the underground French Resistance.
Or Spanish Civil War warriors fighting Franco's fascist forces in 1936 Madrid! No Pasaran!
Their brave exploits include ruining the tiny political events of 81-year-old stroke survivors and getting dissenting medical experts cancelled during covid.
Remember this? https://lettersfromaustralia.substack.com/p/brownshirts-stomp-on-81-year-old
Oh so brave they need to be anonymous for fear that 81-year-old stroke survivors might attack them!
So where are these neo-fascist activist book authors getting their money from? Who is organising them? They didn’t just suddenly appear from nowhere.
Rule Number One about understanding ideology is to comprehend that nothing in politics happens by accident. There is no such thing as a spontaneous political movement that just pops up and grows organically. Like everyday party politics, these sorts of ideological pop-up projects require money - truckloads of money. So who is funding them? Following the money trail to its source is the first and most effective step in cutting the heads off these neo-fascist snakes. Their intent is clear - to progress the collapse of Australian society. But on whose behalf are they acting? Let us do a bit of investigating.
Look closely at the cover of the book, the ALL seeing eye. Masons. I'd use it as a door stop.
with comments like that you'll be in the sequel!
It's obvious and it's what they do.
As working journos, they got a book deal from Ultimo Press. IDK who paid the thousands for the Pete Evans retreat. Poor Pete Evans - his life was totally destroyed by the covid fascism, and he tries to rebuild it positively. And they do this to him.
IDK if Ultimo Press paid for that or if they got a government grant - it would have been a good question at Waverley Library event to ask, but I very respectfully waited till the end and you only get one question.
“ This is not evidence of Australian racism, it’s evidence of poor quality control at Melbourne universities.”
Understatement of the Day. (Maybe year)
It’s absolutely ironic that the refutation of points in your article takes far more space than the review of the trash.
Brenton Tarrant was SEVEN YEARS AGO and still they harp back to it because it’s all they’ve got.🤦🏻♀️
From 2013 to April 2024 there have been 56413 attacks by Muslim extremists with 204937 DEAD. Tarrant is really only comparable now to a trans school shooter. 🙄
oh yes, the far-left have got the solitary actors Brenton Tarrant and Norwegian Anders Breivik. Vile mass murderers but hardly part of a mass movement.
They try to shoehorn Wieambilla in to pad the list even though Wieambilla was flat out mental illness.
These are the three murderous events they harp on in all the parliamentary submissions.
If you read that parliamentary submission co-written by cam smith and jordan mcswiney above, you will see "far-right" and "Christchurch" for page after page, creating sub-categories of "radical far-right" and "extreme far-right" and generally over-analysing and catastrophising anyone who votes One Nation or likes the flag or Australia Day. Any "so-called Australian" basically.
They don't totally ignore the Islamist murders of 15 people at Bondi, less than 2 months before their submission, but it is contextualised to oblivion in a much smaller mention down below Christchurch, and "Islam" is minimised out of it as much as possible - despite the fact that Islamism really was the ideologically motivating factor in the Bondi attack, and it really is part of a larger ideological movement as evidenced by Islamic State's enthusiastic praise of the attack in their newsletter.
The same cannot be said of Tarrant and Breivik.
But the left are simply horrified by the unfairness of how many Islamist groups are considered terrorist threats. It seems so unfair when everyone is equal, right? Right? Must be "racism".
It's because they have no idea about Islam and need to read TheReligionOfPeace.com and watch some lectures by Robert Spencer of JihadWatch.
ps; I'm so glad you read that part. Please do click on the link and read that terrible paper that calls all of Convoy To Canberra white supremacists.
I went to that protest, caught the train down, got there just as it was ending. There were definitely more than 100,000 people streaming off the hill and not one of the people that I saw was in any way racist.
Some of them had terrible burns, however, underneath their shirts, one man's was shaped like a neat red oblong on his chest. These remain unexplained to this day, by authoriites.
It will backfire, particularly with boys. And maybe it's meant to. Nothing like being provocative to keep the Revolution on the boil.
Thank You for the comprehensive inspection and exhaustive dismantling of the book, the 'movement', and its players👍
You'll probly not hear from those to whom you've put your questions (unless they're REally arrogant and think that they've 'gotcha')
but laying out those points and contentions for the rest of us to absorb and perhaps reuse when needed
IS extremely valuable!
thanks! there was so much more...
You know, I was impressed that Cam Wilson is indeed trying to make the world a better place by preventing people floating off from reality. The problem as i see it, is that there is an echo chamber - the milieu has shifted journalist perceptions.
every perspective and opinion and analysis (intellectually/logically rigorous or not)
regardless of alignment no matter the subject
has its own echo chamber
it seems more about tribal affinity than merit
folks are comfortable in any environment that affirms their bias identity
thinking stuff through to arrive at a position that might put one at risk of disfavor from the bias identity tribe
is just.too.hard.
but that's just my opinion😏